Obstructive Sleep Apnea Found to Increase Risk of Sick Sinus Syndrome, unravels study

A recent study revealed that individuals with an inherited susceptibility to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk for developing sick sinus syndrome (SSS), a bradyarrhythmia involving the heart’s own pacemaker. The study was conducted by Chen W. and fellow researchers published in the journal Nature and Science of Sleep.

OSA is a prevalent sleeping disorder that features recurring blockage of the airway while one is asleep and subsequent periods of intermittent lack of oxygen. SSS, on the other hand, refers to a wrong rhythm of the heart due to defective sinoatrial node function that leads to dizziness, drowsiness, and syncope. Both these diseases have risks of effects on cardiovascular performance, thus it is vital to identify whether one directly affects the other while designing prevention strategies and treatment procedures.

To establish the causal relationship between OSA and SSS, the researchers used a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) strategy. The technique utilizes genetic differences as instrumental variables to assess causality between an exposure (OSA) and an outcome (SSS), thus eliminating confounding factors.

Genetic information on OSA were accessed from FinnGen genome-wide association studies with a sample of 410,385 participants. Equivalently, SSS association data were from deCODE genetics with a population base of 1,000,187 individuals. The group used various statistical methods for ensuring robustness such as inverse-variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median estimation, maximum likelihood, and MR-PRESSO for sensitivity analysis and identification of pleiotropy.

Key Findings

  • The main MR analysis with IVW (fixed effects) found a 49.3% higher risk of SSS among those genetically at risk of OSA (OR = 1.493; 95% CI: 1.120–1.990; P = 0.006). This was calculated on the basis of 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables.

  • The MR-Egger intercept value of −0.002 (SE 0.030; P = 0.930) provided no indication of horizontal pleiotropy, such that the observed association was not likely to be confounded by genetic effects. The global test for pleiotropy (P = 0.719) also confirmed this result.

  • Reverse MR analysis indicated that there was no reverse causality—i.e., SSS did not predict an increased risk for OSA development (OR = 0.997; 95% CI: 0.926–1.072; P = 0.930).

This Mendelian randomization study presents strong evidence of a causal association between obstructive sleep apnea and elevated risk of sick sinus syndrome, based on large-scale genetic information from more than a million people. These findings underscore the importance of increased awareness and active management of OSA to potentially lower the burden of cardiac conduction disorders in the population.

Reference:

Chen, W., Pan, W., Ling, L., Jiang, B., Zhang, Y., Su, X., Jiang, T., & Lin, J. (2025). Causal effect of obstructive sleep apnea on sick sinus syndrome: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Nature and Science of Sleep, 17, 689–700. https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.s511973

Powered by WPeMatico

Previous Gastrectomy independent risk factor for POBL Risk in laparoscopic liver resection Patients: Study

Researchers have found in a new research that previous gastrectomy was as an independent risk factor for post-operative bile leakage (POBL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Further in order to reduce the incidence of POBL in high-risk cases, meticulous surgical techniques and comprehensive perioperative management are essential.

Postoperative bile leakage is a common cause of major complications following liver resection. Although the use of laparoscopy for liver surgery has expanded rapidly, bile leakage after laparoscopic liver resection has not been well described. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for bile leakage following laparoscopic liver resection. A total of 510 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic tumors between January 2009 and December 2023 were included in this study. Bile leakage was defined according to the criteria established by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Its occurrence, consequences, clinicopathological characteristics, and surgical details were evaluated retrospectively. Risk factors were identified using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Bile leakage occurred in a small number of patients. It was more frequently observed in older individuals, those with a history of gastrectomy, and those who experienced other postoperative complications or extended hospital stays. Multivariable analysis revealed that a history of gastrectomy was independently associated with the occurrence of bile leakage. All affected patients were successfully treated using percutaneous drainage, with some also requiring endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. A previous gastrectomy was identified as an independent risk factor for bile leakage in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection.

Reference:

Ide, T., Ito, K., Tanaka, T. et al. Influence of previous gastrectomy on postoperative bile leakage after laparoscopic liver resection. BMC Surg 25, 139 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02873-1

Keywords:

Previous, Gastrectomy, independent, risk factor, POBL, Risk, LLR Patients, Study, Ide, T., Ito, K., Tanaka, T, Postoperative bile leakage, Laparoscopic liver resection, Previous gastrectomy

Powered by WPeMatico

Thrombectomy Patients Face Higher Stroke Risk After 90 Days, Study Finds

USA: A recent real-world data analysis has highlighted concerns about the long-term outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. While the procedure remains a vital intervention in the acute phase, the study found that risks persist well beyond the initial 90-day recovery period.

“Patients who underwent thrombectomy faced a 25% higher risk of recurrent stroke compared to controls (HR 1.25), with recurrence rates of 63.3% versus 53.1%,” the researchers reported in Frontiers in Neurology. “Additionally, their two-year stroke- and palliative care-free survival was notably lower (36.6% vs. 45.8%). Although mortality rates were similar between the groups, palliative care use was slightly less among thrombectomy patients.” Key factors influencing these outcomes included age, underlying comorbidities, and procedural complications.

While previous studies have primarily focused on 90-day outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombectomy, little is known about their long-term prognosis. To address this gap, Adnan I. Qureshi, Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institutes, Columbia, MO, United States, and colleagues compared extended outcomes—specifically, survival rates and the incidence of recurrent strokes—between patients who underwent thrombectomy and those who did not.

For this purpose, the researchers used Oracle Real-World Data—a large, de-identified dataset of multicenter electronic health records from January 2016 to January 2023—to analyze outcomes in 3,934 acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy and 3,934 matched controls who did not. They assessed the risk of death, palliative care, and new stroke beyond 90 days post-admission using Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for confounding factors. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also employed to estimate stroke- and palliative care-free survival rates.

The study led to the following findings:

  • Of the 3,934 acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy, 2,660 either died, received palliative care, or experienced a new stroke during a median follow-up of 775 days.
  • The two-year stroke- and palliative care-free survival rate was 36.6% for thrombectomy patients compared to 45.8% for those who did not undergo the procedure (adjusted HR: 1.19).
  • The risk of palliative care or death was similar between the two groups (adjusted HR: 0.89).
  • Patients who underwent thrombectomy had a higher risk of recurrent stroke compared to controls (adjusted HR: 1.25).

The study found that acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy faced a significantly higher risk of experiencing a new stroke, receiving palliative care, or dying beyond 90 days compared to those who did not receive the procedure. The researchers note that this elevated risk, largely driven by stroke recurrence, highlights the need for long-term monitoring and strengthened preventive strategies to ensure sustained benefits of thrombectomy in this high-risk group.

Reference:

Qureshi, A. I., Baskett, W. I., Bhatti, I. A., Ovbiagele, B., Siddiq, F., Ford, D. E., Gomez, C. R., Hanley, D. F., & Shyu, C. (2025). Post 90-day outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients following thrombectomy: Analysis of real-world data. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, 1543101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1543101

Powered by WPeMatico

Guideline on platelet and plasma transfusion released by American College of Chest Physicians

The American College of Chest Physicians® (CHEST) recently released a new clinical guideline on the transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) andplatelets in critically ill adults. Published in the journal CHEST®, the guideline contains seven evidence-based recommendations to provide a framework for clinicians to implement in their own facilities.

“In practice, we see all too often [that] prophylactic transfusion of platelets or fresh frozen plasma is done unnecessarily,” says Angel Coz Yataco, MD, FCCP, lead author on the guideline. “Transfusion is rarely needed prior to bedside procedures, with lumbar puncture being a possible exception. Following the new guideline, we can drastically reduce the use of FFP.”

The panel of experts developed seven Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome questions addressing platelet and FFP transfusions in critically ill patients and performed a comprehensive evidence review. The panel applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to assess the certainty of evidence and to formulate and grade recommendations.

“In the United States, 20% of platelets and FFP are transfused to critically ill patients, totaling 2.2 million units of each annually,” says Dr. Coz Yataco. “They are scarce resources with variable costs and access globally. If implemented on a large scale, this guideline provides the framework to decrease the use [to] approximately half a million less units of platelets and FFP transfused annually in the United States alone.”

The panel formulated seven conditional recommendations. In addition to four procedure-specific recommendations, the guideline recommends:

 In stable non-bleeding critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia and without high risk of spontaneous bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 10 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

• In stable non-bleeding critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia who are considered at high risk of spontaneous bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 30-50 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

• In critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia and serious active bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 50 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

The entire list of recommendations included in the new guideline are as follows-

Summary of Recommendations

The recommendations in this document apply to critically ill patients, excluding trauma and neuro-critical care populations. These recommendations should be implemented in a hierarchal fashion. Recommendations 1-3 should be applied first to critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia, while recommendations 4-7 provide additional guidance for specific situations involving invasive procedures.

1. In stable non-bleeding critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia and without high risk of spontaneous bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 10 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

2. In stable non-bleeding critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia who are considered at high risk of spontaneous bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 30-50 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

3. In critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia and serious active bleeding, we suggest transfusing platelets if platelet counts fall below 50 × 109/L (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence)

4. Vascular procedures

4 A. In critically ill patients at increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia undergoing a central venous catheter or arterial line insertion, we suggest against routine prophylactic platelet transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

4 B. In critically ill patients at increased risk of bleeding due to coagulopathy undergoing a central venous catheter or arterial line insertion, we suggest against routine prophylactic FFP transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

5. Bedside thoracic or abdominal procedure

5 A. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia undergoing a bedside thoracentesis or paracentesis, we suggest against routine prophylactic platelet transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

5 B. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to coagulopathy undergoing a bedside thoracentesis or paracentesis, we suggest against routine prophylactic FFP transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

6. Lumbar Puncture

6 A. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia undergoing a bedside lumbar puncture, we suggest platelet transfusion if platelets counts are 40-50 × 109/L or lower (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

6 B. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to coagulopathy undergoing a bedside lumbar puncture, we suggest FFP transfusion to target INR 1.5-2 before the procedure (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

7. Bedside Endoscopy

Bronchoscopy

7 A. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia undergoing routine flexible bronchoscopy without biopsy, we suggest against routine prophylactic platelet transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

7 B. In critically ill patients with increased risk of bleeding due to coagulopathy undergoing a routine bedside flexible bronchoscopy without biopsy, we suggest against routine prophylactic FFP transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

GI Endoscopy

7 C. In critically ill patients with suspected portal hypertension related GI bleeding and increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia who are undergoing GI-endoscopy, we suggest against routine platelet transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence)

7 D. In critically ill patients with suspected portal hypertension related bleeding and increased risk of bleeding due to coagulopathy who are undergoing GI-endoscopy, we suggest against routine FFP transfusion (Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).

Reference:

Yataco, Angel Coz et al., Transfusion of Fresh Frozen Plasma and Platelets in Critically Ill Adults, CHEST Journal, DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.029 

Powered by WPeMatico

Pregnancy and Calcium: Study suggests how to Tackle Silent Issue of Hypocalcemia during pregnancy

Maternal hypocalcemia is a significant healthcare issue characterized by low serum calcium levels during pregnancy. This condition is largely influenced by the physiological demands of pregnancy and inadequate dietary calcium intake, particularly prevalent in African nations with socio-economic challenges. The global prevalence of hypocalcemia among pregnant women ranges from 25.5% to 70.6%, with higher instances noted in developing regions. Recent study conducted at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania, aimed to ascertain the prevalence of hypocalcemia among pregnant women and identify its key predictors within this demographic.

Physiological Demands for Calcium During Pregnancy

The introduction emphasizes how physiological changes during pregnancy create an increased need for calcium—approximately 300-350 mg per day for fetal bone development—while dietary deficiencies contribute to the risk of maternal hypocalcemia. The importance of adequate maternal calcium levels is underscored; lower levels can trigger physiological responses that may lead to complications such as preeclampsia. The methodology adopted for this study was a cross-sectional design executed from June 2022 to January 2023. Pregnant women with a gestational age of 20 weeks or more were eligible to participate if they provided consent. The sampling involved a calculated size of 382 participants, accounting for potential non-responses. Data were collected through a standardized questionnaire and blood samples were drawn for serum calcium measurement.

Findings on Prevalence and Predictors of Hypocalcemia

Notably, the study found a 23.2% prevalence of hypocalcemia among the 651 pregnant women analyzed. This prevalence is lower than figures reported in several other studies from different regions, possibly due to better access to calcium-rich dietary sources in Tanzania. The study identified several predictors significantly associated with maternal hypocalcemia, including multiple pregnancies, insufficient calcium supplementation, fewer than four antenatal care (ANC) visits, prior history of preeclampsia, and residence in rural areas.

Impact of Multiple Pregnancies and ANC Visits

Multiple pregnancies were linked to a heightened risk of hypocalcemia, attributed to the increased maternal calcium demand. The absence of routine calcium supplementation during ANC visits was found to directly contribute to lower calcium levels, reinforcing that diet alone might be inadequate—especially for populations prone to nutritional deficiencies. Similarly, low frequency of ANC visits correlated with higher hypocalcemia risk, emphasizing ANC’s role in nutritional education and health monitoring.

Historical and Socio-economic Factors Affecting Calcium Levels

Additionally, women with a previous history of preeclampsia displayed challenges in maintaining normal calcium levels in subsequent pregnancies, likely due to persistent physiological effects from earlier pregnancies. Rural residence emerged as a significant risk factor, likely due to limited access to education and healthcare resources, along with poor dietary practices influenced by socio-economic constraints.

Unexpected Findings Regarding Gestational Age

Interestingly, the study indicated that gestational age in the third trimester did not align with the anticipated increase in hypocalcemia risk, suggesting potential influences from the participants’ socio-economic backgrounds and nutritional statuses that could affect calcium levels independently of pregnancy progression.

Study Limitations and Recommendations

Limitations include the study’s focus on patients attending a tertiary hospital, which may limit the generalizability of findings. The study concludes that approximately one in five pregnant women at the facility experienced hypocalcemia. Recommendations entail routine hypocalcemia screening, implementation of regular calcium supplementation during ANC visits, and enhancing nutritional education focused on calcium-rich food sources as vital strategies to mitigate risk and improve maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Reference –

Godluck H Mlay et al. (2025). Predictors Of Maternal Hypocalcemia Among Pregnant Women Attending At A Tertiary Referral Hospital In Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. *BMC Pregnancy And Childbirth*, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07536-w.

Powered by WPeMatico

FDA Approves Zevaskyn for Treating RDEB-Related Blistering Wounds

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved prademagene zamikeracel (Zevaskyn) for the treatment of blistering wounds caused by recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) in both adults and children, according to an announcement by Abeona Therapeutics.

There is no cure for RDEB and ZEVASKYN is the only FDA-approved product to treat RDEB wounds with a single application.

“Today’s approval of ZEVASKYN represents a pivotal moment in the treatment of RDEB, answering the call of people living with the clinical, economic, and human impact of this devastating disease,” said Vish Seshadri, Ph.D., M.B.A., Chief Executive Officer of Abeona. “We have heard from the RDEB community that there is a persistent unmet need to reliably address RDEB wounds, especially those that are chronic and prone to infection. Through a single surgical application, ZEVASKYN can now offer people with RDEB the opportunity for wound healing and pain reduction in even the most severe wounds, as evidenced by the results from our pivotal Phase 3 study.”

First-of-its-kind gene therapy with robust body of clinical evidence

The FDA approval of ZEVASKYN is based on the pivotal Phase 3 VIITAL™ study (NCT04227106), a multi-center, randomized, intrapatient-controlled trial that met its two co-primary efficacy endpoints demonstrating statistically significant healing of 50 percent or more from baseline in large chronic RDEB wounds, and pain reduction from baseline as assessed by the Wong-Baker FACES scale, as evaluated at six months after treatment.

Across 43 large and chronic wounds treated with a single application of ZEVASKYN, 81 percent of wounds showed 50 percent or more healing (P<0.0001) as evaluated at six months, compared to 16 percent in 43 matched control wounds treated with standard of care. The most common adverse events were observed in fewer than five percent of patients and included procedural pain and itch.

“ZEVASKYN was well-tolerated and efficacious in clinical studies, providing clinically meaningful improvements in wound healing, pain reduction, and other associated symptoms in large chronic RDEB wounds after a single application,” said Jean Tang, M.D., Ph.D., professor of dermatology and lead principal investigator of the VIITAL™ study. “In the completed Phase 1/2a study of ZEVASKYN, we have observed wound healing and pain reduction that have lasted for years after a single application. Today we can celebrate the availability of an exciting new therapeutic option made possible by the incredible courage of patients and families who participated in these clinical studies.”

In the Phase 1/2a study of ZEVASKYN (NCT01263379), a single center, open label study in 38 chronic wounds across 7 patients showed that a single surgical application of ZEVASKYN was associated with long-term improvement at treated sites over a median follow-up of 6.9 years; range 4 to 8 years.

“After many years of work, it is great to see this FDA approval of ZEVASKYN. The EB patients deserve all that we can do for them,” said M. Peter Marinkovich, M.D., associate professor of dermatology and co-principal investigator of the VIITAL™ study.

“Based on the strength of our data across clinical trials, we are confident in ZEVASKYN’s ability to deliver long-term results after a single treatment application,” said Madhav Vasanthavada, Ph.D., M.B.A., Chief Commercial Officer of Abeona. “We are committed to working closely with both commercial and government payers on outcome-based agreements that stand behind the promise of ZEVASKYN for patients, and expedite access.”

Across both clinical studies, ZEVASKYN was well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events observed to date.

Anna L. Bruckner, MD, Co-Director of the EB Clinic at Children’s Hospital of Colorado and Professor of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, said, “The FDA approval of ZEVASKYN marks a monumental step forward for individuals living with RDEB and their families, offering a much-needed, long-lasting treatment option for this devastating condition and providing hope for improved quality of life for these patients.”

Amy Paller, M.D., pediatric dermatologist and clinical researcher, said, “Grafting gene-corrected skin onto chronically open wounds of patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa promises the potential to provide long-term healing of wounds, reduction in pain and reduced risk of infection. This therapeutic option will nicely complement recently approved topical products.”

Dr. Seshadri added, “We are grateful to the patients, their families, and caregivers for their support of ZEVASKYN. We express our gratitude to debra of America for their unwavering support throughout the development journey, in particular, for their interactions with the FDA in support of ZEVASKYN and on behalf of the EB community that have helped make today’s regulatory approval possible. We are also thankful for the clinical study investigators, study site personnel, and the entire Abeona team for their collective commitment and determination through the development process, and contribution to this milestone achievement. We look forward to providing the RDEB community access to now-approved ZEVASKYN.”

Addressing the underlying cause of RDEB

With mutations in both copies of the COL7A1 gene that expresses Type VII collagen, people with RDEB have extremely fragile skin characterized by extensive blistering and severe wounds that often cover more than 30 percent of a patient’s body surface, and in some cases up to 80 percent. RDEB wounds cause debilitating pain and systemic complications impacting the length and quality of life. These wounds are difficult to heal, can remain open for years, and many that do close tend to reopen.

ZEVASKYN consists of a patient’s own skin cells (keratinocytes) that have been genetically modified, to produce functional Type VII collagen. ZEVASKYN sheets are surgically applied to the patient’s wounded areas. In a single application of ZEVASKYN, up to 12 credit card-sized sheets can be joined together to cover large areas or applied to multiple distinct wounds, allowing for signficant coverage of affected body areas.

Brett Kopelan, M.A., Executive Director of debra of America, the only national advocacy organization that provides all-inclusive care to the epidermolysis bullosa community, and father to Rafi, a teenager with RDEB, said, “I, and the team at debra of America, are very excited about the FDA’s approval of ZEVASKYN. Given that this therapeutic product addresses even the largest, most difficult, and problematic chronic wounds, we believe that the application of ZEVASKYN can significantly increase the quality of life of patients. Furthermore, I believe ZEVASKYN has the potential to transform the day-to-day standard of care for patients who suffer with these large chronic nonhealing wounds that cause significant pain and stress not only for the patient, but also for their caregivers. We are honored to have formed such a close relationship with Abeona over the years and look forward to deepening our partnership by helping ensure there is broad access for the patient population to ZEVASKYN, which I know is their ultimate goal.”

Michael Hund, M.B.A., Chief Executive Officer of EB Research Partnership (EBRP), the largest global organization dedicated to funding research to treat and cure epidermolysis bullosa (EB), said, “The mission of EBRP is to advance commercially sustainable research aimed at treating and ultimately curing EB. We are honored to partner with the entire Abeona team and commend their leadership, determination, and passion to deliver much needed innovative solutions for individuals and their families living with EB. They continue to share our values and commitment to accelerate treatments to the EB community as quickly as possible. Abeona’s development and advancement of ZEVASKYN delivers a landmark moment for the global EB community, and their leadership in gene therapy holds so much promise to innovate the therapeutic landscape for not only EB, but many other rare diseases and conditions. EBRP is looking forward to collaborating with Abeona to continue to support the EB community.”

ZEVASKYN availability in the third quarter of 2025

ZEVASKYN is expected to be available beginning in the third quarter of 2025 through ZEVASKYN Qualified Treatment Centers (QTCs). The QTCs are well-recognized epidermolysis bullosa treatment centers with cell and gene therapy experience, situated across the U.S. to ensure patients nationwide have access to this important treatment.

Abeona’s comprehensive patient support program, Abeona Assist™, offers personalized support, including helping patients understand their insurance benefits and financial assistance options, and providing travel and logistical assistance for eligible patients. 

“We are grateful to the dedicated scientists whose work over the past decade made the development of ZEVASKYN possible,” said Marissa Perman, MD, Section Chief of Dermatology and Director of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Multidisciplinary Clinic at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and paid consultant to Abeona. “Having a new, uniquely differentiated, gene therapy for our patients with RDEB is a significant milestone in helping these special patients live fuller, pain-free and itch-free lives with less wounds. As a physician caring for patients with RDEB, I look forward to the opportunity to see this treatment in our practice.”

Joyce Teng, MD, PhD, professor in dermatology with multiple hospital affiliations, said, “I’m thrilled to celebrate a groundbreaking advancement in therapeutic development for recessive dystrophic EB, a condition that has long needed an innovative solution. ZEVASKYN offers additional hope for patients and families affected by this painful and devastating skin disorder. This milestone is a testament to the dedication of scientists, researchers and medical professionals who have worked tirelessly to bring cutting edge treatments to those in need. It represents a scientific triumph, a profound step toward improving quality of life for individuals affected. We look forward to seeing the impact that this therapy will have on so many lives.”

In connection with the FDA approval, Abeona received a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher (PRV). The Company plans to monetize the PRV.

About Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), a rare connective tissue disorder without a cure, is characterized by severe skin wounds that cause pain and can lead to systemic complications impacting the length and quality of life. People with RDEB have a defect in both copies of the COL7A1 gene, leaving them unable to produce functioning type VII collagen, which is necessary to anchor the dermal and epidermal layers of the skin.

About ZEVASKYN™ (prademagene zamikeracel) gene-modified cellular sheets or pz-cel

ZEVASKYN is the first and only autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy for the treatment of wounds in adult and pediatric patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). RDEB is a severe skin disease caused by a defect in both copies of the COL7A1 gene resulting in the inability to produce functional type VII collagen. Without functional type VII collagen and anchoring fibrils, the skin is fragile and blisters easily, leading to wounds that continually open and close, or fail to heal altogether. Patients often have large open wounds that are at a high risk of systemic infection. ZEVASKYN incorporates the functional type VII collagen-producing COL7A1 gene into a patient’s own skin cells, ex vivo, using a replication-incompetent retroviral vector to produce functional type VII collagen in treated wounds. ZEVASKYN has demonstrated clinically meaningful wound healing and pain reduction with a single surgical application.

Powered by WPeMatico

Research alert: High cannabis use linked to increased mortality in colon cancer patients

Researchers at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine have found that individuals with colon cancer and a documented history of high cannabis use were more than 20 times more likely to die within five years of diagnosis compared to those without such a history.

“This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that heavy cannabis use may have underrecognized impacts on the immune system, mental health and treatment behaviors-all of which could influence cancer outcomes,” said lead author Raphael Cuomo, Ph.D., associate professor in the Department of Anesthesiology at UC San Diego School of Medicine.

The research team drew on electronic health records from more than 1,000 colon cancer patients treated across the University of California Health system between 2012 and 2024. They evaluated how cancer outcomes differed based on patients’ documented cannabis use before diagnosis, controlling for age, sex and indicators of disease severity such as tumor staging and cancer biomarkers.

The analysis found:

• Patients with a history of cannabis use disorder (CUD) had a substantially higher five-year mortality rate (55.88 %) compared to patients without CUD (5.05 %).

• Patients diagnosed with CUD prior to cancer diagnosis were 24.4 times more likely to die within five years of diagnosis compared to those without CUD.

While some laboratory studies have shown anti-tumor effects from certain cannabis compounds, the authors note that real-world use is more complex. Given the increasing prevalence and social acceptance of cannabis use, they also emphasize the need to further investigate its long-term effects in medically vulnerable populations.

“High cannabis use is often associated with depression, anxiety and other challenges that may compromise a patient’s ability to engage fully with cancer treatment,” said Cuomo, who is also a member of UC San Diego Moore’s Cancer Center. “However, this isn’t about vilifying cannabis. It’s about understanding the full range of its impacts, especially for people facing serious illnesses. We hope these findings encourage more research-and more nuanced conversations-about how cannabis interacts with cancer biology and care.”

Reference:

Raphael E. Cuomo, Cannabis use disorder and mortality among patients with colon cancer, Annals of Epidemiology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.04.012.

Powered by WPeMatico

Can inpatient psychiatric care help teens amid a depressive crisis?

There has been a troubling rise in adolescent mental health struggles and suicide rates over the past decade, with a dramatic increase following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This crisis has been accompanied by an increased demand for pediatric inpatient psychiatry units (IPUs) across the United States. However, despite the growing need, which has reached the point of bed shortages, the effectiveness of IPUs on teen mental health outcomes remains understudied.

This study, led by Dr. Patricia Ibeziako from Boston Children’s Hospital, reviewed the electronic medical records and self-report questionnaires of over 200 adolescents (ages 12–17) admitted to the IPU between September 2021 and September 2023. Their study was published in the journal Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice on April 21, 2025. They found one of the highest lifetime rates of suicide attempts ever reported in adolescents, with more than 75% of teens reporting at least one suicide attempt in their lifetime. Furthermore, nearly 70% of participants reported having suicidal thoughts within two weeks before admission, highlighting the severity of this mental health crisis. Depression was the most common diagnosis, with 93% of adolescents meeting the diagnostic criteria. This was often accompanied by other conditions such as anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and trauma-related disorders.

At the hospital, the teens received daily care from doctors, therapists, nurses, and counsellors. They also had access to group therapy, school support, and help with any physical health problems. The team used special tools to assess suicide risk and conduct safety planning. They also used proven therapies like Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), which are known to help people with depression and suicidal thoughts.

Most importantly, the study focused on the teens’ own voices by using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)—surveys that asked the teens how they were feeling and functioning. This helped the care team understand what was working and what needed more attention.

But despite the high severity of symptoms upon admission, the study found that the patients showed significant improvement by the time they were discharged. “Self-reported measures on depression, anxiety, emotional regulation, family functioning, and overall life satisfaction all improved significantly”, says Dr. Ibeziako. “In fact, the largest treatment effect was seen in depressive symptoms, and improvements were observed across all subscales of depression, including mood, suicidal ideation, and energy levels.”

Perhaps most strikingly, the study found that adolescent scores for suicidal thoughts decreased by more than half. “The implementation of enhanced suicide screening and treatment that aligns with the Zero Suicide framework has made a meaningful difference in these young people’s lives,” adds Dr. Ibeziako. This framework, which was introduced during the first year of the pandemic, takes a comprehensive, system-wide approach to suicide prevention. The findings showed that when paired with other treatments for depression, the intervention led to significant improvements in symptoms and emotional regulation. “Pediatric IPUs play a crucial role in delivering these life-saving interventions,” emphasizes Dr. Ibeziako.

The results of this study show that timely and targeted psychiatric care can be lifesaving. With adolescent depression and suicidal thoughts at an all-time high, these results are a clear call to action for healthcare systems to prioritize resources and access to pediatric IPUs and further research into their outcomes.

Reference:

Patricia Ibeziako, Inpatient Psychiatry Patient Reported Outcomes: Adolescent Emotional Distress, Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors, Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20240127.

Powered by WPeMatico

Buccal and Intranasal Midazolam Effective for Managing Uncooperative Children in Dental Treatment: Study

Researchers have found in a new research that both buccal (85%) and intranasal (80%) midazolam proved effective in calming uncooperative children during dental procedures.

Behavioral management techniques are not always sufficient, and then it is necessary to use pharmacological management methods. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of buccal midazolam sedation with intranasal midazolam in non-cooperative children during dental treatment. A randomized single blinded comparative clinical study consisted of 40 children aged 3–6 years who were divided randomly into two groups: Group A intranasal midazolam and Group B buccal midazolam. The onset time of action and recovery time from sedation were compared between the two groups, and the efficacy of sedation was evaluated by Houpt behavior scale. The independent student’s T test, Mann–Whitney U test, the Wilcoxon test and the Chi-square test were used. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the onset time of action (p = 0.458) and recovery time from sedation (p = 0.148). There were no statically significant differences between the two groups in sleeping, crying, and movement categories (p = 0.747), (p = 0.183), (p = 0.732), respectively, or in the overall Houpt scale (p = 0.393), there were statistically significant differences in the sleep variable between the two studied phases in the intranasal group (p = 0.014) and in the movement variable in the buccal group (p = 0.039). Both buccal midazolam and intranasal sedation were effective in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment at 85% and 80%, respectively.

Reference:

Arnaout, Doaa, Altinawi, Mohamed, Katbeh, Imad, Tuturov, Nikolay, Saleh, Ahmad, Evaluation of the Efficacy of Buccal Midazolam in Comparison With Intranasal Midazolam Sedation in Uncooperative Children During Dental Treatment, International Journal of Dentistry, 2025, 4269519, 6 pages, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/4269519

Keywords:

Buccal, Intranasal, Midazolam, Effective, Managing, Uncooperative, Children, Dental Treatment, Study , Arnaout, Doaa, Altinawi, Mohamed, Katbeh, Imad, Tuturov, Nikolay, Saleh, Ahmad

Powered by WPeMatico

AI Matches Radiologists in Detecting TB and Chest X-Ray Abnormalities, Finds Multi-Site Study

USA: In a significant step toward enhancing tuberculosis (TB) screening efforts, a recent multi-site prospective study has validated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting active pulmonary TB and other chest X-ray (CXR) abnormalities. Conducted in settings with high TB and HIV prevalence, the study found that AI tools performed comparably to radiologists in triaging suspected TB cases.

“AI matched the performance of radiologists in detecting active tuberculosis and also showed promise in identifying other chest X-ray abnormalities effectively,” the researchers wrote in NEJM AI.

To enhance TB screening in resource-limited settings, researchers explored using artificial intelligence to interpret chest X-rays as a potential triage tool for active pulmonary tuberculosis. Sahar Kazemzadeh, Google, Mountain View, CA, and colleagues aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available CXR-based AI system in detecting active TB in real-world clinical settings.

For this purpose, the researchers assessed two cloud-based chest X-ray AI tools—one for detecting tuberculosis and the other for identifying general CXR abnormalities—in a high-TB and HIV burden population. The study included 1,978 adults with TB symptoms, recent TB exposure, or newly diagnosed HIV across three clinical sites.

The TB AI scores were evaluated using two thresholds: one for high sensitivity and another to mirror radiologist performance. Ten radiologists reviewed the X-rays independently, blinded to the reference results. The primary aim was to test whether the TB AI was noninferior to radiologists, while secondary analyses compared its performance with WHO targets. The abnormality AI was also evaluated against triage-appropriate sensitivity and specificity benchmarks.

Key Findings:

  • Among the 1,910 patients analyzed, 1,827 (96%) had a conclusive TB diagnosis. Of these, 649 patients (36%) were HIV positive, and 192 patients (11%) were TB positive.
  • The TB AI demonstrated 87% sensitivity and 70% specificity at the high-sensitivity threshold.
  • At the balanced threshold, the TB AI showed 78% sensitivity and 82% specificity.
  • Radiologists had a mean sensitivity of 76% and a mean specificity of 82%.
  • At the high-sensitivity threshold, TB AI was noninferior to the average radiologist’s sensitivity but not to specificity.
  • TB AI exceeded the WHO target for specificity but did not meet the sensitivity benchmark.
  • At the balanced threshold, the performance of TB AI was comparable to that of radiologists.
  • The abnormality AI achieved 97% sensitivity and 79% specificity, meeting both predefined performance targets.

The study concluded that the chest X-ray-based AI system for tuberculosis detection performed on par with radiologists when used for triaging active pulmonary TB in populations with high TB and HIV prevalence. However, neither the AI tool nor the radiologists met the World Health Organization’s recommended sensitivity levels in this setting. The AI system also showed promise in identifying other chest X-ray abnormalities, highlighting its potential for broader clinical use.

Reference:

Kazemzadeh S, Kiraly AP, Nabulsi Z, Sanjase N, Maimbolwa M, Shuma B, Jamshy S, Chen C, Agharwal A, Lau CT, Sellergren A, Golden D, Yu J, Wu E, Matias Y, Chou K, Corrado GS, Shetty S, Tse D, Eswaran K, Liu Y, Pilgrim R, Muyoyeta M, Prabhakara S. Prospective Multi-Site Validation of AI to Detect Tuberculosis and Chest X-Ray Abnormalities. NEJM AI. 2024 Oct;1(10):10.1056/aioa2400018. doi: 10.1056/aioa2400018. Epub 2024 Sep 26. PMID: 39823016; PMCID: PMC11737584.

Powered by WPeMatico