Early Postpartum Contraceptive Implant Placement Safe for Breastfeeding females: Study Finds

USA: Researchers have found in a new study that inserting a contraceptive implant within the first 24 hours postpartum is safe for breastfeeding individuals. This finding supports users, healthcare providers, and hospitals in offering placement at a time that best meets the user’s needs.

The study was published online in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology on 20 March 2025.

The researchers note that breastfeeding and contraception are vital in patient and public health. The etonogestrel contraceptive implant, a widely used long-acting progestin contraceptive, is highly effective and has few medical restrictions. Although there are concerns that early exposure to exogenous progestin might affect lactation, previous studies have shown that immediate placement does not hinder milk production or long-term breastfeeding. However, no studies have directly compared implant placement within 24 hours of delivery to placement at a later postpartum visit.

To address this, Jamie W. Krashin, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, 4ACC, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, and colleagues examined whether inserting the implant within 24 hours of childbirth affects breastfeeding continuation compared to placement at least two weeks later. Breastfeeding rates were assessed at eight weeks postpartum to determine if timing influenced lactation success.

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial at two university hospitals in the Mountain West, enrolling postpartum participants planning to breastfeed and use the etonogestrel implant. Eligible participants, aged 13 or older with term deliveries and no contraindications, were randomly assigned to receive the implant within 24 hours or at least two weeks postpartum. Baseline data were collected through chart reviews and questionnaires, while breastfeeding status and implant use were tracked via electronic surveys at multiple postpartum intervals. The study assessed a 15% non-inferiority margin for breastfeeding at 8 weeks in the per-protocol population.

The study led to the following findings:

  • One-hundred-fifty participants were enrolled (78 in the immediate group and 72 in the delayed group).
  • After excluding 8 participants who declined implant placement, withdrew, or were ineligible, and 16 who lacked primary outcome data, the modified intention-to-treat analysis included 126 participants (69 immediate, 57 delayed).
  • The per-protocol analysis included 115 participants (62 immediate, 53 delayed) after excluding 11 who received the implant outside the designated timeframes.
  • Both groups were similar in age, race, ethnicity, previous breastfeeding experience, delivery mode, and epidural use, but prior implant use was less common in the delayed group (29% vs. 43%).
  • At eight weeks postpartum, 77.4% in the immediate group and 81.1% in the delayed group reported any breastfeeding. The -3.7% difference exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin, with a lower confidence interval of -16%.
  • In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the difference between groups was smaller (-0.6%) and within the non-inferiority margin (-12.8% lower confidence limit), with 78.3% in the immediate group and 78.9% in the delayed group reporting any breastfeeding.
  • Implant continuation at 24 weeks was slightly higher in the immediate group (96%) compared to the delayed group (85%), though the difference was not statistically significant.
  • Exclusive or any breastfeeding and implant continuation through 24 weeks were similar between both groups.

The study found no significant differences in breastfeeding or implant continuation between immediate and delayed placement, despite the primary outcome slightly exceeding the non-inferiority margin.

“These findings support the safety and flexibility of initiating the etonogestrel implant at any preferred time postpartum for breastfeeding individuals,” the authors concluded.

Reference:

Krashin, J. W., Rivera-Montalvo, M., Leeman, L., Trujillo, V. Y., Petersen, T. R., Sanchez, D., Bender, E., Carroll, S., Bulleit, E., Alcantara, J., Turok, D. K., Black, P., & Espey, E. (2025). Breastfeeding after immediate versus delayed postpartum contraceptive implant placement: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.019

Powered by WPeMatico

For eye infections, delayed doctor visits and extent of damage affect vision outcomes: Study

Even though microbial keratitis is a preventable cause of blindness, it’s a complex infection to treat, and many patients have lasting vision impairment.

Previous studies have identified several risk factors for reduced vision after treatment, including delays in symptom onset, longer duration of symptoms and existing eye disease.

However, these studies were restricted to one geographic area or a single type of organism that causes the infection.

In a study published in Ophthalmology, physicians followed 562 patients in the United States and India over a three-month period to identify risk factors that could be easily managed with early intervention.

Maria A. Woodward, M.D., an associate professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences and a member of the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, answers questions about what causes microbial keratitis, symptoms and preventative measures.

What are the common causes for microbial keratitis?

Woodward: We are surrounded by microorganisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus and fungi, which can get into our eyes through small injuries.

This is a common outcome in patients who do not have good contact lens hygiene or have an underlying eye condition that makes them prone to infections.

Although we don’t know the prevalence rates in the U.S., worldwide it affects over 2 million people per year.

What are symptoms of microbial keratitis?

Woodward: It depends on the infection. Some types of bacterial infections can progress incredibly quickly while fungal infections are slower.

Early symptoms include eye pain, severe eye redness and blurry vision. Some patients also experience light sensitivity.

Unfortunately, many ignore these warning signs and continue to use contact lenses, which can make the problem worse.

If left untreated, the condition causes eye pain and can ultimately penetrate deeper into the eye resulting in scarring and vision loss.

What factors affect treatment for microbial keratitis?

Woodward: The majority of infections in the U.S. are usually treated with antibiotic eye drops.

In our study, we found that if a patient had reduced vision or waited for symptoms to worsen, treatments did not work as well.

Interestingly, we saw that patients in the U.S. who wore contact lenses had slightly better outcomes.

We suspect that their physicians could easily identify what kind of infections are associated with wearing lenses and were able to treat them earlier.

In India, we observed a similar effect in patients with a history of eye trauma.

In rural areas, it’s common for people to get something in their eye that can lead to an infection.

It’s possible that the physicians there knew what kind of infection they might have, given their environment and history, and were able to administer treatments sooner.

What future directions are you excited to pursue?

Woodward: Although this work doesn’t represent everyone globally, we found some commonalities regardless of where the participants were from.

It is important to expand these studies to include factors such as access to medications and adherence to eyedrop regimens.

As part of this work, we took serial photographs of patients over time to monitor how their eye characteristics change over time.

We can use this to help physicians distinguish between mild and severe cases and treat patients effectively.

Reference:

Woodward, Maria A. Factors Associated with Vision Outcomes in Microbial Keratitis, Ophthalmology, DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.02.004 

Powered by WPeMatico

Dexamethasone Implant Promising as Adjunctive Therapy in Coats’ Disease: Study Finds

Turkey: A retrospective single-center study published in BMC Ophthalmology has highlighted the potential role of intravitreal dexamethasone implants as an adjunctive therapy in managing Coats’ disease alongside conventional ablative treatments. The research, conducted by Ozlem Ural Fatihoglu and colleagues from the Department of Ophthalmology at Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey, assessed the efficacy and safety of this approach over a long-term follow-up period.

The study evaluated patients treated between February 2012 and January 2024 who received a dexamethasone (Dex) implant in addition to standard ablative therapy, with a follow-up duration exceeding 12 months. Out of 15 enrolled patients, the analysis included 11 patients. The cohort primarily consisted of males (90.9%) with unilateral disease, while the only female participant presented with bilateral involvement. The mean age at diagnosis was 14.8 years, spanning a wide age range from 2 to 60 years, highlighting the diverse presentation of the disease.

The following were the notable findings of the study:

  • At baseline, 58.3% of the eyes were classified as stage 3a1, 25% as stage 3a2, and 16.7% as stage 2b.
  • Over an average follow-up of nearly 66 months, visual acuity remained stable in 50% of the treated eyes.
  • One-third of the eyes showed measurable improvement of at least one Snellen line.
  • Two eyes demonstrated a two-line gain, while the other two eyes achieved a single-line gain in visual acuity.
  • Vision deteriorated in both eyes during the study period.
  • Transient intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation was observed in 66.7% of treated eyes.
  • Cataract progression occurred in 58.3% of eyes, with one-third requiring cataract surgery.
  • One eye developed a secondary vasoproliferative tumor, necessitating CyberKnife therapy and vitrectomy.
  • No severe implant-related complications were reported, indicating a favorable safety profile for the treatment.

The findings suggest that intravitreal dexamethasone implants may serve as a useful adjunctive option, particularly in pediatric patients, to reduce the need for repeated general anesthesia and in adults with extensive macular exudation, where conventional ablative therapy alone may be insufficient. While the outcomes are promising, the authors acknowledge key limitations, including the retrospective design, small sample size, absence of a control group, and the study’s setting in a tertiary referral center, which may have resulted in a higher proportion of advanced cases.

Despite these limitations, the research highlights the value of dexamethasone implants in achieving anatomical and functional stabilization in Coats’ disease. With half of the treated eyes maintaining stable vision and one-third showing improvement, the study adds evidence supporting the integration of steroid implants into multimodal treatment strategies,” the authors wrote.

They recommend further studies to validate these findings and better define patient subgroups that may benefit most from this adjunctive approach.

Reference:

Ural Fatihoglu, O., Ayhan, Z., Ozturk, T. et al. Place of dexamethasone implant as an adjunctive treatment in Coats’ disease: a retrospective single-center study. BMC Ophthalmol 25, 435 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04279-2

Powered by WPeMatico

Imposter Syndrome among Orthopaedic Surgery residents extremely common and disproportionately affects female residents: Study

Imposter syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which individuals experience persistent self-doubt and feelings of inadequacy despite achieving objective measures of success. This phenomenon is associated with lower job satisfaction, increased rates of burnout, and reduced productivity.

Harsh Wadhwa et al conducted a study to determine the prevalence of imposter syndrome among orthopaedic surgery residents and determine whether specific individual or residency characteristics predict higher rates of imposter syndrome.

The study was performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.

An anonymous survey was distributed to residents at 7 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residencies by the authors. Respondents provided deidentified demographic data and completed the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) assessment. CIPS scores were used to categorize imposter syndrome severity as none to mild, moderate, significant, or intense. Differences were calculated and compared using t-test and x2 analyses. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of increased symptom severity.

The key findings of the study were:

• One hundred orthopaedic surgery residents completed the survey.

• Forty percent of respondents were female, and the mean age was 30.6 ± 2.8 years.

• The prevalence of significant or intense imposter syndrome was 73%.

• CIPS scores and significant or intense imposter syndrome did not vary by age, gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, level of training, program region, research year, non-MD degrees, and Step 1, Step 2, or Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) scores on univariable analyses.

• On multivariable analysis, female residents were 5.64 (OR = 5.64 [1.04-30.63]) times more likely to have significant or intense imposter syndrome (p = 0.045).

• Residents at western programs were 0.13 (OR = 0.13 [0.02-0.90]) times as likely to experience significant or intense imposter syndrome (p = 0.039).

• Women (estimate = 8.72 [1.41-16.04]; p = 0.0201) and those with OITE scores in the 0 to 25th (estimate = 11.92 [0.29- 23.54]; p = 0.0446) and 51st-75th (estimate = 12.73 [2.79-22.67]; p = 0.0128) percentiles had higher CIPS scores.

The authors concluded that – “Imposter syndrome is highly prevalent among orthopaedic surgery residents, with significant or intense symptoms affecting 73% of those surveyed. Female gender and lower OITE scores were associated with increased imposter syndrome severity, while training at an orthopaedic surgery residency program in the West was associated with decreased imposter syndrome. Additional research is needed to identify effective interventions to address imposter syndrome and minimize its effects on individuals’ careers. Implementing focused initiatives to address imposter syndrome may help alleviate burnout and promote both career fulfillment and professional growth.”

Further reading:

Imposter Syndrome Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents is Extremely Common and Disproportionately Affects Female Residents

Harsh Wadhwa et al

JBJS Open Access 2025:e24.00132. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00132

Powered by WPeMatico

125 MBBS seats at AIIMS Kalyani Check 2025 admission guidelines, fee, complete details here

Kalyani- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Kalyani has released a prospectus for admission into the MBBS course for the academic year 2025. The Course of studies leading to the award of Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) of the AIIMS shall last for a minimum of five and a half academic years, including one year’s compulsory internship.

As per the prospectus, a total of 125 seats for Indian nationals are available for admission to the MBBS course. The reservation matrix would be as per the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) directives. AIIMS Kalyani has an MBBS course divided into three professional divisions, i.e. First, Second and Third Professional MBBS are of one, one and a half and two years duration respectively.

Admitted candidates must attend the Orientation Program and join classes on the stipulated date. The admission of the candidates, who fail to join the Course by the date stipulated in the letter of intimation, shall automatically be cancelled and such seats shall then be offered to the candidates on the waiting list in order of merit in the same category

The candidates selected for admission to the MBBS course at the AIIMS Kalyani, after verification of their eligibility and being offered admission, should bring the following original certificates/ testimonials/documents at the time of admission-

1 Certificate of having passed the 10+2 or equivalent Examinations, showing the subject offered by him/her in the Examination.

2 Certificate from the Board from which he/she passed the High School/Higher Secondary Examination, showing his/her date of birth.

3 Certificate/Mark sheet from the Board from which he/she passed the 10+2 or equivalent Examination showing that he/she has secured 60% or more marks (50% in case of SC/ST/Persons with Benchmark Disability) in aggregate in English, Physics, Chemistry and Biology.

4 Migration Certificate from the University/Board last attended by him/her.

COMPULSORY ROTATORY INTERNSHIP TRAINING

After passing the Final MBBS Examination, all the candidates will be required to do a compulsory internship for a period of one calendar year (12 months) in the hospital and rural health centres recognised by the AIIMS. During the internship period, the interns are allowed a total of 15 days leave in the full term of one year. The degree of MBBS shall be awarded after satisfactory completion of one year’s internship.

FEES & OTHER PAYMENTS

The dues are to be paid in cash immediately, after the candidates have been declared medically fit in the Medical Board of the Institute, as per details given below-

S.NO

ACADEMIC & OTHER FEES

AMOUNT IN RS

1

Registration Fee

25

2

Caution Money

100

3

Tuition Fee

1350

4

Laboratory Fee

90

5

Student Union Fee

63

TOTAL

1628

S.NO

HOSTEL & OTHER FEES

AMOUNT IN RS

1

Hostel Rent*

990

2

Gymkhana Fee

220

3

Pot Fund

1320

4

Electricity Charges

198

5

Mess Security (Refundable)

500

6

Hostel Security (Refundable)

1000

TOTAL

4228

To view the prospectus, click the link below

https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/aiims-kalyani-mbbs-2025-125-seats-offered-know-complete-admission-rules-fee-structure-297700.pdf

Powered by WPeMatico

Flatworms could replace rats for in vivo brain studies

Tiny pond worms could help find new ways to treat schizophrenia, develop an understanding of drug addiction and test new medicines for mental illnesses—all while reducing the number of mice and rats used in early medical research.

Powered by WPeMatico

Medical pros of electroconvulsive therapy may be exaggerated while cons are downplayed

The medical pros of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are being exaggerated while the risks are being downplayed, suggest the findings of a survey on the type of information patients and their relatives/friends recall having been given before the procedure, and published online in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

Powered by WPeMatico

Global study finds heart failure drug spironolactone fails to lower cardiovascular risk in dialysis patients

A large international study has found that spironolactone, a medication for high blood pressure and heart failure, does not reduce the risk of heart-related death or hospitalizations in people with kidney failure receiving dialysis, despite earlier smaller studies suggesting benefit.

Powered by WPeMatico

Experts recommend SGLT-2 and GLP-1 only for adults at moderate to high risk of heart and kidney problems

SGLT-2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs should be used in all or almost all adults with type 2 diabetes at higher risk of cardiovascular and kidney complications, and in the majority of adults at moderate risk of complications, says a panel of international experts in The BMJ.

Powered by WPeMatico