Evidence-based Diagnosis and Treatment of Vasa Previa: Clinical Obstetrics Gynecology

Vasa previa is an obstetrical complication associated with
fetal death and neonatal morbidity and is defined as fetal velamentous vessels
overlying or in close proximity to the cervix. Because these velamentous
vessels lack the protection of Wharton jelly or the placenta and are fixed
within the membranes, they are at risk of laceration during labor or membrane
rupture with resultant fetal exsanguination. Another cause of fetal compromise
with vasa previa is postulated to be compression of the velamentous vessels, leading
to fetal asphyxia.

When undiagnosed prenatally, vasa previa is associated with
perinatal mortality as high as 56% and significant morbidity in survivors. The
risk of perinatal death and hypoxic-ischemic morbidity is 25-fold and 50-fold
greater, respectively, than in cases in which vasa previa is diagnosed during
the antepartum period. With prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound and an
appropriate surveillance and management strategy, the perinatal mortality rate
is < 1%. Intact survival with prenatal diagnosis is also significantly
higher with prenatal diagnosis than in those without a prenatal diagnosis.

While prenatal diagnosis is associated with a reduction in
perinatal mortality rate, infants are still at risk of complications related to
prematurity. An important management tenet to reduce the risk of morbidity and
mortality is the delivery of the fetus before the onset of labor, usually in
the late preterm period. In this study, the factor most associated with
unplanned delivery before scheduled cesarean was multifetal gestation, and the
most common reasons for unplanned delivery were preterm labor/contractions,
followed by vaginal bleeding and nonreassuring fetal testing.

A metaanalysis of 113 cohort studies and case series including
1298 pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa determined that
perinatal mortality is rare when vasa previa is diagnosed prenatally, affecting
0.5% of cases. In this metaanalysis, only 0.51% of the mortalities were related
to a ruptured vasa previa. Congenital anomalies or prematurity accounted for
the majority of deaths.

Diagnosis

From a historical perspective, vasa previa was suspected
when a patient presented with vaginal bleeding, and an Apt test indicated that
the blood was fetal in origin before the wide availability of ultrasound. The
Apt test is acolorometric alkaline denaturation test. Because fetal hemoglobin
is more resistant to denaturation than adult hemoglobin, a fetal specimen will
turn pink when mixed with sodium hydroxide whereas maternal hemoglobin will
turn yellow-brown. The Apt test is no longer available in the United States and
has been replaced by the vastly superior technique for vasa previa diagnosis
using ultrasound.

In this modern era, vasa previa is an ultrasound diagnosis
confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound demonstrating velamentous fetal vessels
unprotected by Wharton jelly or placenta within 2 to 5 cm from the internal os.
The differential diagnosis includes funic presentation, placenta previa,
membrane separation, subchorionic hematoma, and maternal vascular sinuses.

On gray-scale imaging, a vasa previa will appear as an
echogenic line or a thin-walled echogenic oval with a central echolucency. In
many cases, findings associated with vasa previa can be subtle when using
gray-scale imaging alone. However, the application of color Doppler to the area
will demonstrate flow behind the echogenic line or within the echogenic oval.
Pulsed Doppler will demonstrate either venous or arterial flow. If the arterial
flow is present, the rate will be consistent with the fetal heart rate. If
venous flow is demonstrated, tracing the vessel to its origin and destination
will assist in identifying it as a fetal vessel.

To differentiate vasa previa from alternative diagnoses, the
following techniques are helpful:

Evaluate the vessel(s) in orthogonal planes and trace the
vessels using ultrasound to their origins—both in the placenta and in the
fetus.


Use color Doppler to demonstrate flow within the area.

Apply pulsed Doppler to determine the heart rate (if
arterial vessel).


Three dimensional ultrasound rendering the coronal view of
the lower uterine segment while color Doppler is applied is useful in identifying
lateral velamentous vessels and demonstrating the relationship of these vessels
to the internal cervical os. Asking the
patient to cough, manually elevating the fetal presenting part, and/or
adjusting the head of the examination table may assist in differentiating funic
presentation from vasa previa.


Role of Screening for Vasa Previa

Controversy exists over who and how to screen for vasa
previa. Because prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa is lifesaving, many experts
advise universal screening for vasa previa. A focus group involving 68
international experts using a Delphi process concluded that all pregnancies
should be screened for vasa previa using ultrasound at the time of the
second-trimester anatomy scan.

For practices that have implemented universal cervical
length screening with transvaginal ultrasound at the time of the anatomical
ultrasound to assess the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, screening for vasa
previa means close inspection of the area immediately surrounding the internal
os for signs of vasa previa using gray scale ultrasound and color Doppler.
Alternatively, a 2-step screening process has been proposed by which: Transabdominal ultrasound is used to inspect
the placental edge, placental cord insertion, and lower uterine segment.

If any of the
following is noted—succenturiate or multilobate placenta, velamentous cord
insertion, multifetal gestation, low placenta (defined as previa or low lying),
or in-vitro fertilization pregnancy, then an abdominal scan of the cervix with
color Doppler is performed. Transvaginal ultrasound is recommended if the
transabdominal ultrasound cannot visualize the cervix sufficiently or there is
concern for vasa previa. When vasa previa or a low placenta is detected with
ultrasound screening, a follow-up ultrasound should be performed at 28 to 32
weeks to ensure that the placenta has moved away from the cervix and that there
is no vasa previa remaining after placental migration.

Management

Antepartum Surveillance

Asymptomatic patients diagnosed with vasa previa on
ultrasound and no risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth can reasonably be
managed as outpatients with monthly ultrasound for fetal growth due to the
association of vasa previa with fetal growth restriction. In practice, authors
recommend pelvic rest and avoidance of sexual intercourse. Serial cervical
surveillance with transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length may be
considered to evaluate the patient’s risk of spontaneous preterm birth. If vasa
previa is again seen on transvaginal ultrasound at 28 to 32 weeks, a discussion
should occur with the patient regarding inpatient observation.

Many experts recommend routine inpatient observation as
early as 32 weeks with close monitoring for contractions and fetal assessment
with frequent nonstress testing. Inpatient observation has also been proposed
to allow close proximity to an operating room should the patient experience
vaginal bleeding, preterm prelabor membrane rupture, or demonstrate signs of
fetal decompensation on electronic fetal monitoring. A disadvantage of routine
hospitalization may be an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and
iatrogenic preterm birth.

For patients carrying a singleton gestation without signs of
vaginal bleeding, contractions, or cervical shortening, continued outpatient
management may be considered with weekly biophysical profiles and non-stress
testing. Shared decision-making should be used to determine inpatient versus
outpatient management and the timing of inpatient admission (if inpatient
management is agreed upon). For those patients at higher risk of spontaneous or
indicated preterm delivery, practice is to manage them with inpatient
observation. Patients carrying a singleton gestation with vaginal bleeding,
persistent preterm contractions, or short cervix in the third trimester are
admitted at the time of symptom or finding onset. Uncomplicated multifetal
gestations are typically admitted for inpatient management at 32 weeks; they
are admitted earlier in the third trimester if they present with vaginal
bleeding, persistent preterm contractions, or short cervix.

As the vast majority of patients with prenatally diagnosed
vasa previa will be delivered preterm, consideration should be given to
antenatal corticosteroid administration to reduce the risk of neonatal
morbidity related to prematurity. There is no consensus on the timing of
corticosteroid administration but it should be based on patient history, signs
and symptoms, and clinical judgment. Steroids are often administered at the
time of hospitalization (before 34 wk gestation) as indications for urgent
delivery may preclude steroid administration.

Delivery

Delivery for patients with uncomplicated vasa previa is
recommended through cesarean delivery between 35 and 37 weeks. Within this
range, 36 weeks appears to achieve the best perinatal outcomes when balancing
the risks of prematurity against the risk of a sudden unpredictable fetal
event. For patients with multifetal gestations, short cervix, and/or signs or
symptoms of preterm labor, the timing of delivery should be individualized through
shared decision-making.

Authors advise the following approach to performing cesarean
delivery in the setting of vasa previa:

One unit of O-negative packed red blood cells should be
ordered and held in the operating room for the neonate in the event of unanticipated
fetal vessel rupture and bleeding during fetal extraction efforts.


Once neuraxial anesthesia has been introduced and the
patient has been positioned for the cesarean, ultrasound mapping of the fetal
vessels in the lower uterine segment is performed (and it may be performed
preoperatively or intraoperatively).


In the absence of a complicated web of fetal vessels
overlying the anterior lower uterine segment, a low transverse uterine incision
is planned through a space avoiding any velamentous vessels.


When the low transverse uterine incision is made, all
attempts are made to maintain intact membranes until the uterine incision is
expanded and a safe window for delivery of the fetus is identified.


The lower uterine segment is elevated using allis clamps to
avoid inadvertent membrane rupture during uterine incision.


Once the uterus is entered, the incision is sharply expanded
laterally using bandage scissors with the membranes protected by the surgeons’
fingers between the membranes and the lower uterine segment.


The membranes are not ruptured until an area free of fetal
vessels is safely identified, and the membranes are entered sharply.


In practice, authors do not perform delayed cord clamping
for pregnancies affected by vasa previa as it is difficult to determine whether
the velamentous vessels remain intact after delivery of the infant.


Role of Fetoscopic Laser Ablation

Fetoscopic laser ablation of fetal vessels has been
investigated as a treatment of vasa previa with the goal of resolving the vasa
previa thus allowing the patient to achieve a term vaginal birth. It is a
procedure that has been proposed only for the treatment of type 2 and 3 vasa
previa as type I vasa previas involves major vascular branches arising directly
from the umbilical cord. There have been several case series describing the
procedure and outcomes. The most recent one involved fetoscopic laser ablation
of 20 vasa previa cases at 31 to 33 weeks and demonstrated a mean delivery
gestational age of 37.2 weeks and a 70% vaginal delivery rate. There were no
perioperative complications in this series. However, operative fetoscopy, in
general, is associated with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm
delivery, and placental abruption, among other complications. At this time,
fetoscopic laser ablation of vasa previa therapy is considered experimental,
and larger-scale research studies are necessary before implementing it into
routine practice.

Vasa previa is an uncommon finding associated with a
substantial risk of perinatal death and morbidity when undiagnosed prenatal.
Implementation of routine ultrasound screening for vasa previa in the second
trimester is associated with >95% intact perinatal survival. Optimal
outcomes are achieved with a surveillance approach involving shared
decision-making with the patient and delivery through cesarean between 35 and
37 weeks for otherwise uncomplicated vasa previa patients.

Source: Ross and Roman; Clin Obstet Gynecol Volume 68, Number 1, March 2025

Powered by WPeMatico

Alarming levels of microplastics discovered in human brain tissue, linked to dementia: Study

In a comprehensive Commentary published today in Brain Medicine , researchers discuss alarming new evidence about microplastic accumulation in human brain tissue, providing critical insights into potential health implications and prevention strategies. This Commentary examines findings from a groundbreaking Nature Medicine article by Nihart et al. (2025) on bioaccumulation of microplastics in decedent human brains.

The research reveals that human brains contain approximately a spoon’s worth of microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs), with levels 3-5 times higher in individuals with documented dementia diagnoses. More concerning still, brain tissues showed 7-30 times higher concentrations of MNPs compared to other organs like the liver or kidney.

“The dramatic increase in brain microplastic concentrations over just eight years, from 2016 to 2024, is particularly alarming,” notes Dr. Nicholas Fabiano from the University of Ottawa’s Department of Psychiatry, lead author of the Commentary. “This rise mirrors the exponential increase we’re seeing in environmental microplastic levels.”

Of particular concern are particles smaller than 200 nanometers, predominantly composed of polyethylene, which show notable deposition in cerebrovascular walls and immune cells. This size allows them to potentially cross the blood-brain barrier, raising questions about their role in neurological conditions.

The Commentary review highlights practical strategies for reducing exposure, noting that switching from bottled to filtered tap water alone could reduce microplastic intake from 90,000 to 4,000 particles per year. “Bottled water alone can expose people to nearly as many microplastic particles annually as all ingested and inhaled sources combined,” says Dr. Brandon Luu, an Internal Medicine Resident at the University of Toronto. “Switching to tap water could reduce this exposure by almost 90%, making it one of the simplest ways to cut down on microplastic intake.” Other significant sources include plastic tea bags, which can release millions of micro and nano-sized particles per brewing session. He also highlights that how we heat and store food matters. “Heating food in plastic containers-especially in the microwave-can release substantial amounts of microplastics and nanoplastics,” he explains. “Avoiding plastic food storage and using glass or stainless steel alternatives is a small but meaningful step in limiting exposure. While these changes make sense, we still need research to confirm whether lowering intake leads to reduced accumulation in human tissues.”

The research team also explores potential elimination pathways, including evidence that sweating might help remove certain plastic-derived compounds from the body. However, Dr. David Puder, host of the Psychiatry & Psychotherapy Podcast, warns, “We need more research to wrap our heads around microplastics-rather than wrapping our brains in them-since this could be one of the biggest environmental storms most people never saw coming.”The commentary calls for urgent research priorities, including establishing clear exposure limits and assessing long-term health consequences of microplastic accumulation. The authors emphasize the need for large-scale human studies to determine dose-response relationships between microplastic exposure and chronic health outcomes. 

Reference:

Human microplastic removal: what does the evidence tell us?, Brain Medicine, DOI:10.61373/bm025c.0020.

Powered by WPeMatico

Acromioclavicular joint injuries Isolated midshaft clavicle fractures Injuries: Challenges and Considerations

According to a new study published in BMC Surgery, Ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries with midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs) are uncommon and frequently go unnoticed, particularly in mild cases. The exact injury mechanism remains uncertain, and no established classification system determines severity. These injuries are typically treated separately, as no standardized protocol exists. Although current outcomes are promising, further research is needed to improve understanding and assess long-term results.

Isolated midshaft clavicle fractures (MCF) and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but simultaneous cases are rare and often receive insufficient clinical attention, resulting in missed diagnoses. Moreover, there is no consensus on the injury mechanism, classification, and treatment, and the prognosis remains poorly summarized. This review aims to provide an overview of MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries, focusing on injury mechanism, classification, treatment, and prognosis. The searched the literature published between 1962 and 2024 on PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE using the search terms “clavicle fracture [Title/Abstract]) AND (acromioclavicular [Title/Abstract])”. Studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients with MCF and ipsilateral ACJ injuries were included. 37 studies were included after screening. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Data on study design, patient demographics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were extracted for qualitative analysis. We then summarized key findings and presented our insights. Results: MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries are often associated with comorbidities such as rib fractures, hemopneumothorax, scapula fractures, neurovascular injuries, and atypical MCF displacement patterns. These cases should raise suspicion for combined injuries. Due to the “floating” nature of the lateral clavicle, the “Piano Key Sign” is typically negative and not reliable for diagnosis. Initial ACJ evaluation may be inconclusive, so reevaluation after MCF fixation is recommended. Type IV ACJ injuries can be underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs, and additional axillary radiographs and CT scans may better visualize posterior clavicle displacement. Most researchers believe ACJ capsule and ligament damage occurs first, but is insufficient to cause significant dislocation, suggesting that isolated MCF may involve combined ACJ injury with intact coracoclavicular ligaments. Notably, most patients reported favorable outcomes without major complications within two years, regardless of treatment approach. MCFs with ipsilateral ACJ injuries are rare and often missed when ACJ injuries are mild. The injury mechanism is unclear, and no classification system exists to indicate severity. These injuries are typically treated separately without a unified protocol. Despite promising outcomes, further studies are needed to address these issues and improve understanding of long-term results.

Reference:

Wang, C., Li, X., Dong, S. et al. Midshaft clavicle fractures with associated ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint injuries: a systematic review. BMC Surg 25, 87 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02815-x

Keywords:

Wang, C., Li, X., Dong, S, Clavicle fracture, Acromioclavicular joint, Midshaft clavicle, Bipolar clavicle injuries, Coracoclavicular ligament

Powered by WPeMatico

Rohtak Varsity MBBS Exam Scam update- Scamsters took Rs 1 crore from students for clearing 34 subjects

Haryana- The ongoing police investigation into the MBBS exam scam at Pandit BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, has revealed that the racketeers had taken Rs 1 crore from the students of a private college in 2023 in exchange for passing them in 34 subjects. These students had failed in these 34 subjects and were vying to pass the exams.

According to a Tribune report, sources revealed that the racketeers had fixed a minimum bribe amount of Rs 2 lakh per subject as part of the deal. Out of Rs 1 crore, one of the accused kept Rs 50 lakh for himself and gave the remaining amount to a middleman. The result did not go as per the deal and the racketeers were able to pass only 18 subjects. This led to discontent among the students who had paid the hefty amount but could not clear the exam.

Meanwhile, during interrogation, the accused revealed the names of all the students who had paid money to pass the exam. Along with this, the police are now preparing to question these students to confirm the statements of the accused. In the meantime, there is a panic situation created among the students as soon as they got to know about the cross-examination, reports Tribune.

Along with this, police have also recovered Rs 6 lakh, a paper stitching machine and two mobile phones from a university official named in the FIR lodged against 24 students and 17 employees. On this, Medical Dialogues has reported that the university official has been identified as Roshan Lal. DSP Dalip Singh, the investigating officer in the case, said that cash and the machine had been seized from him. However, 3 accused including Roshan Lal are currently in jail.

Powered by WPeMatico

Drug Alert: CDSCO Flags 52 Formulations As Not Of Standard Quality

New Delhi: In its latest drug alert, the apex drug regulatory body, the Central Drug Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), has flagged 52 medicine batches for failing to qualify for a random drug sample test for January 2025.

These include Monopropylene Glycol manufactured by Shell Eastern Chemicals, Ticagrelor Tablets manufactured by Monique Pharmaceuticals, Calcium Aspartate, Calcium Orotate, Calcitriol, Minerals And Vitamins Tablets manufactured by Overseas Healthcare, Diclofenac Sodium manufactured by Srinija Parenterals and others.

The alert stated that, as part of the continuous regulatory surveillance, drug samples are picked from sales/distribution points, analyzed, and lists of Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) drugs are displayed on the CDSCO portal on a monthly basis.

The drugs that fail to meet the quality standards or specifications are known as Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) drugs.

Furthermore, the term ‘standards of quality’ is defined under the Section 16 (1) (a) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, that the ‘standards of quality’ mean that the drug complies with the standards set out in the Second Schedule of the said Act.

The alert further mentioned that as part of the continuous regulatory surveillance, drug samples are picked from sales/distribution points, analyzed, and lists of Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) drugs are displayed on the CDSCO portal on a monthly basis. The purpose of displaying the NSQ list is to make stakeholders aware of the NSQ batches identified in the market.

A few of the reasons why the drug samples tested failed were the failure of the assay, failure of the dissolution test, failure of pH, particulate matter, and description.

The samples collected were tested in five laboratories CDL, Kolkata, RDTL, Guwahati, CDTL-Mumbai, CDTL – Indore, CDTL Hyderabad and RDTL Chandigarh.

NOT OF STANDARD QUALITY (NSQ) ALERT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2025

A. CDSCO/Central Laboratories

S.No

Product/Drug Name

Batch No.

Manufacturing Date

Expiry Date

Manufactured By

NSQ Result

Reported by CDSCO

Laboratory

1.

Monopropylene Glycol USP

9971702044

04/2024

04/2026

M/s. Shell Eastern Chemicals, the Metropolis Tower 1, 9, North Buona Vista Drive#0701, Singapore-138588

Water

CDL, Kolkata

2.

Ticagrelor Tablets IP 90 mg (Tigamon 90)

MT230087

11/2023

10/2026

M/s. MONIQUE PHARMACEUTICAL S PVT. LTD., Plot

No-676, Sector-69, IMT, Faridabad, Haryana-121004

Dissolution

CDL, Kolkata

3.

Calcium Aspartate, Calcium Orotate, Calcitriol, Minerals And

Vitamins Tablets

EZF-1989

07/2024

12/2026

M/s. Overseas Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., 335 Km Milestone, National Highway No.1, P.O. Box-25,

Phillaur-144410 (Pb)

Assay/content of ‘Calcitriol’ and ‘Zinc’

CDL, Kolkata

4.

Diclofenac Sodium Injection I.P

(DEPAIN-75)

SNDA23801

08/2023

07/2025

M/s. Srinija Parenterals, D.No. 283, Doctors Estate,

Perecherla 522 009

pH

CDL, Kolkata

5.

Iron Sucrose Injection USP 100mg/5ml

24RS04

01/2024

12/2025

M/s. SAI Parenterals Limited, D1 & D4, Survey No.280, Phase-V, IDA, Jeedimetla,

Hyderabad- 500055.TS

pH

CDL, Kolkata

6.

Iron Sucrose Injection USP 100mg/5ml

24RS08

02/2024

01/2026

M/s. SAI Parenterals Limited, D1 &D4, Survey No.280, Phase-V, IDA, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad-

500055.TS

pH

CDL, Kolkata

7.

Tramadol Hydrochloride Injection 50 mg/ml (Tramacop )

RP-04

07/2023

06/2025

M/s. Bio Medica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., 254, Sector-F, Sanwer Road, Industrial Area,

Indore-452015

‘Acidity or Alkalinity’ and ‘Assay of Tramadol’

CDL, Kolkata

8.

Metformin Hydrochloride Sustained Release Tablets

I.P. 500mg

(Conmet SR- 500)

C21D93400 3

06/2024

05/2027

M/s. Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd., A-28/3, MIDC,

Chikalthana, Aurangabad-431006

Dissolution

CDL, Kolkata

9.

Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets IP 500 mg

4617001

05/2024

04/2026

M/s. Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 164, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata-700 054

Dissolution

CDL, Kolkata

10.

Cefixime & Ofloxacin Tablets

CT5853A

03/2024

02/2026

M/s. J.M.LABORATORIES

Village-Bhanat, P.O.- Ghatti, Subathu

Assay of Cefixime

CDL, Kolkata

(CEPHAFLU- 400)

Road, Solan (HP)- 173211

11.

Ambroxol HCL, Levosalbutamol sulphate and Guaiphenesin Drops (Breath- LS Drops )

HBD 2403

04/2024

03/2026

M/s. HIPPO LABS PVT. LTD, Plot No-

17, R. G. Nagar, IDA, Prashanthi Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72

Description

CDL, Kolkata

12.

Ofloxacin Ophthanmic Solution IP (Ocuex Eye Drops)

ED4648

11/2024

10/2026

M/s. Captab Biotec, Unit-II, Plot No. 125,

E.P.I.P. Road, Mauja, Jharmajri, Baddi, Dist. Solan (H.P.)-

173205

Assay of Ofloxacin

CDL, Kolkata

13.

Gentamicin Injection I.P. 30 ml

GM-19

04/2024

03/2026

M/s. New Lab Industry, Ramnagar, Kurthoul, Patna

SPURIOUS

Particulate Matter, Extractable Volume, Composition of Gentamicin Sulphate, Identification and Assay of Gentamicin

Sulphate and Description

CDL, Kolkata

14.

Non-Sterile Not for Intravenous Administration Concentrated Acidic Solution

BT229

07/2024

06/2025

M/s. Bio Tech Formulation, Block A- 10, Plot No-136,

D.No. 17-65,

Penamaluru Mandal, New Autonagar, Kanuru, Vijayawada- 520007

Appearance of solution, assay of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and total chloride.

Particulate contamination

and description

CDL, Kolkata

15.

Clobazam Tablets IP 5 mg

TPT-012058

01/2024

12/2026

M/s. Tanpal Pharmaceuticals, D- 12-13, Focal Point,

Nabha-147 201

Dissolution

CDL, Kolkata

16.

Vitamin B- Complex with Vitamin C and Zinc Capsules (Nutribest-Plus )

1724-226

05/2024

10/2025

M/s. ZEE LABORATORIES

LTD., Behind 47, Industrial Area, Paonta Sahib-173025

Assay of ‘Cyanocobalami n’ and ‘Calcium Pantothenate’

CDL, Kolkata

17.

Metoclopramide Injection BP

4EC038092

08/2024

07/2027

M/s. Ciron Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Pvt.

Ltd., N-118/119,

M.I.D.C., Tarapur, Boisar, Dist-Palghar- 401506

Description and Particulate Contamination

CDL, Kolkata

18.

Sodium Chloride and Glycerine Sterile Diluent for fowl pox vaccine and its combinations

for wing web application

ACF24159

11/2024

10/2026

M/s. Safe Parenterals Pvt. Ltd. Gollapadu 522408, Palnadu Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India

Description, Appearance of solution and Particulate matter

CDL, Kolkata

19.

Rabeprazole Sodium Injection I.P.

MD23H13

08/2023

07/2025

M/s. Martin & Brown Bio-Sciences Pvt. Ltd., K. No. 918/419,

Malkumajra, Nalagarh Road, Baddi, Dist- Solan (H.P.)-173205

pH, Water, Clarity of Solution, Particulate matter and Assay of Rabeprazole

Sodium

CDL, Kolkata

20.

Ofloxacin & Ornidazole Tablets IP (Zeof-O)

SCZAG230 07

06/2023

11/2025

M/s. Sano-Cito Therapeutics Inc., Vill. Loharan, P.O. Ghatti, Solan-173211 (H.P.)

Dissolution

CDL, Kolkata

21.

Calcium Gluconate Injection I.P.

10% w/v (REOCAL)

CG-386

03/2024

02/2026

M/s. Rathi Laboratories(Hindust an) Pvt. Ltd.,

Industrial Area, Patna-800013

pH, Particulate matter, Sterility and Description

CDL, Kolkata

22.

Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate Injection (Dexamethason e 30ml)

DX-18

04/2024

03/2026

M/s. New Lab Industry, Ramnagar, Kurthoul, Patna

SPURIOUS

pH, Extractable volume, Particulate matter, Sterility, Identification and Assay of Dexamethasone Sodium

Phosphate and Description

CDL, Kolkata

23.

Dmex Colecalciferol (Vitamin D3) Tablets B.P.

4D077301

09/2023

08/2026

M/s. 4Care Lifescience Pvt. Ltd. Survey No. 23/3P & 24, Opp. Jeans Factory, Daduram Vistar, Village- Bagdol, Tal. Kathlal, Dist. Kheda-387630,

Gujarat, India

Assay of Cholecalciferol

CDL, Kolkata

24.

Rabeprazole Sodium 20mg (EC) &

Domperidone 10mg (IR),

Domperidone 20mg (SR)

Capsules (Rebast-ARD)

LC-6943

01/2024

12/2025

Lifevision Healthcare, Plot No. 140-141, E.P.I.P., Phase-1,

Jharmajri, Baddi, Distt. Solan (H.P.) 174 103

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

25.

Montelukast & Levocetirizine

Hydrochloride

VLB-GT- 2219

09/2023

08/2025

Vee Laboratories,, Village-Kalier,

Subathu, Road-

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

Tablets IP (SOLIKAST-L)

Saproon (Post Office) Solan-173211, Himachal Pradesh

26.

Zinc Sulphate Dispersible Tablets IP 20 mg

LMT240811

07/2024

06/2026

Life Max Cancer Laboratories, Plot No.

106 & 106 A,

Sector6A, IIE, SIDCUL,

Haridwar249403 (U.K)

Uniformity of dispersion & Disintegration

RDTL, Guwahati

27.

Nimesulide & Paracetamol Tablets (SOMOO)

T-24004

04/2024

03/2026

Kshipra Drugs Pvt. Ltd., 40- 41/22-B,

Industrial Area, No. 1, Dewas (M.P.)- 455001

Disintegration

RDTL, Guwahati

28.

Fexofenadine Hydrochloride Tablets I.P. 120 mg.

UGT231163

08/2023

07/2025

Unimarck Healthcare Ltd., Plot No.: 24, 25 & 37 Sector 6A, SIDCUL, Haridwar –

249403 (Uttarakhand)

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

29.

HYPODERMIC SYRINGE WITH NEEDLE

(Nusafe 2ml)

2407154

07/2024

06/2029

NUBENO HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED,

Plot No. 10A, Sector23, Mihan Nagpur- 441108

Sterility

RDTL, Guwahati

30.

Rabeprazole Sodium (as enteric coated) & Domperidone (As Sustained Release)

Capsules (Rabito-DSR)

RTD.23010 5

08/2023

07/2025

M/s Cartel Laboratories, 10/A, 11/A, Chengicherla, Medchal-Malkajgiri (Dist.), Hyderabad-92

Assay of Rabeprazole Sodium

RDTL, Guwahati

31.

Losartan Tablets IP 50

mg

LMT240826

07/2024

06/2026

Life Max Cancer Laboratories, Plot No.

106 & 106 A, Sector

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

6A, IIE, SIDCUL,

Haridwar249403 (U.K)

32.

Albendazole Tablets IP 400 mg (Albendazole

400)

T-3159

01/2024

12/2025

Jackson Laboratories Pvt.Ltd, 22-24,

Majitha Road, Bye Pass, Amritsar-143 001(India)

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

33.

Itraconazole Capsules IP 100 mg

CTA-01

02/2024

01/2026

Agron Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Sarverkhera, Moradabad Road, Kashipur-244713

(Uttarakhand)

Dissolution

RDTL, Guwahati

34.

Diclofenac Sodium Injection IP (AL- DICLO)

A-1694

02/2024

01/2026

ALCHEMIST REMEDIES PVT. LTD., 133-139,

Industrial Estate, At13, Road, Dewas

pH , Sterility, Particulate Matter, and Assay

RDTL, Guwahati

35.

Calcium 500 mg with Vitamin D3 250 IU Tablets IP

LMT240431

04/2024

03/2026

Life Max Cancer Laboratories, Plot No.

106 & 106 A,

Sector6A, IIE, SIDCUL,

Haridwar249403 (U.K)

Identification and Assay of Vitamin D3 and Dissolution of Calcium

RDTL, Guwahati

36.

Levocetirizine Hydrochloride & Montelukast Sodium Tablets IP (Montura-L)

ZT23547C

11/2024

10/2025

M/s Zenon Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd., Survey-no. 343/P, Bavla Sanand Highway, Modasar,

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA 382220

Dissolution of Montelukast

RDTL, Guwahati

37.

Paracetamol Oral Suspension BP (100 ml) 120

mg/ 5 ml

ZA23019

07/2023

06/2026

Brussels Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., 33, Changodar Ind.

Estate, Sarkhej Bavla Road, Changodar

Assay of Paracetamol

CDTL-Mumbai

Ahmedabad – 382

210, (Gujarat)

38.

Amlodipine Tablets IP 5 mg (Systogan-5)

CT062

08/2024

07/2026

Ryzer Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 901, Dholakuva, Mansa, Gandhinagar, Gujarat- 382845.

Related substances

CDTL-Mumbai

39.

Lorazepam Tablets IP 1 mg (PROLINE – 1)

06P23T03

08/2023

04/2027

Shine Pharmaceuticals Limited., Plot No.

132, Karjan-Vermardi Road, Juni Jitherdi, Ta. Karjan- 391240, Dist : Vadodara, (Gujarat)

Assay

CDTL-Mumbai

40.

Itraconazole Capsules (Trax

– 200)

AFC – 102

05/2024

04/2026

APEX FORMULATIONS PVT. LTD., 1276,

Rajpur Ahmedabad- Mehsana Highway, Dist. Mehsana, Gujarat.

Dissolution

CDTL-Mumbai

41.

Enteric Coated Rabeprazole Sodium And Domperidone Sustained Release Capsules

(Dorab SR Capsules)

AFC – 111

08/2024

07/2026

APEX FORMULATIONS PVT. LTD., 1276,

Rajpur Ahmedabad- Mehsana Highway, Dist. Mehsana, Gujarat.

Dissolution for Domperidone

CDTL-Mumbai

42.

Aceclofenac Tablets IP 100 mg

T042304

11/2023

04/2025

Bengal Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd., (A Govt. of India Enterprise) at 11,

Related substances and Assay of Aceclofenac

CDTL-Mumbai

W.E.A. Faridabad – 121001 (Haryana)

43.

Montelukast Sodium and Levocetirizine Hydrochloride Dispersible Tablets (ROMILAST® L 4)

18RT2401

04/2024

09/2026

Adnova Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. 156, 157 A,

Siddhi Industrial Infrastructure Park, Waghodia, Vadodara

– 391760, Gujarat

Description and Uniformity of dispersion

CDTL – Indore

44.

Metoprolol Succinate Prolonged Release Tablets IP 25 mg

DT 2403

10/2026

09/2027

M/s. Triveni Formulations Limited, Plot No.52, 53, 54

ALEAP Industrial Estate, Surampalli- 521212

Dissolution

CDTL, Hyderabad

45.

Ciprofloxacin Injection IP

LV4210

03/2024

02/2026

Captab Biotec, Unit- II, Plot No. 125,

E.P.I.P.Road, Mauja, Jharmajri, Baddi,

Distt. Solan (H.P.)- 1732025

In test of Lactic Acid per mg of Ciprofloxacin

RDTL, Chandigarh

46.

Ceftriaxone Injection IP (Cefiglad-1 Injection)

SRIJ240041

10/2024

09/2026

SYSTOLE REMEDIES PVT.

LTD., Vill. Ogli, Kala Amb. Teh. Nahan, Distt. Sirmour (H.P.)-

173030

Particulate matter

RDTL, Chandigarh

47.

Cefixime and Lactic Acid Bacillus Tablets (CEFIZOC-200

LB TABLETS)

BT-240511

05/2024

04/2026

A.N.D. HEALTHCARE LTD,

Plot No. C-24, Focal Point, Kurali, Mohali- 140103

Assay of Lactic Acid Bacillus

RDTL, Chandigarh

48.

Hyoscine Butylbromide Tablets IP

PT-102441

10/2024

09/2026

Primus Pharmaceuticals, Sadhoura Road,

Mouza Ogli Khari Vill

Assay of Hyoscine Butylbromide

RDTL, Chandigarh

(BUSCOPRIME

-10 TABLETS)

Asgarpur Majra, Kala Amb, Dist. Sirmour- (H.P.) 173030

49.

Ambroxol HCl, Guaiphenesin, Terbutaline Sulphate and Menthol Syrup (BRONKOREX

AM Syrup)

BALS-2005

11/2023

10/2025

Wings Novitas Healthcare LLP,, 43

& 44, HPSIDC,

Industrial Area, Baddi-173205 (H.P.)

Assay of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Terbutaline Sulphate

RDTL, Chandigarh

50.

Ramipril Tablets IP 5 mg

TPT- 0102040

10-2024

09-2026

Tanpal Pharmaceuticals, D- 12-13, Focal Point, Nabha-147201

Assay of Ramipril

RDTL, Chandigarh

51.

Pyridoxine Tablets IP 10 mg (Pyrotan-10)

TPT- 0102064

10-2024

09-2026

Tanpal Pharmaceuticals, D- 12-13, Focal Point, Nabha-147201

Assay of Pyridoxine

RDTL, Chandigarh

52.

Aceclofenac, Paracetamol and Serratiopeptidas

e Tablets (ST- SP Tablets)

NBT- 240624

11/2024

10/2026

Soft Touch Pharmaceuticals India Lt., Plot No. 8, Industrial Area, Waknaghat, Distt.

Solan (H.P.)-173234

Assay of Aceclofenac and Paracetamol

RDTL, Chandigarh

Also Read:Alkem Laboratories Gets CDSCO Panel Nod To Study Semaglutide solution for injection

To view the official notice, click the link below:

Powered by WPeMatico

Rajkot Hospital suspended from PMJAY, fined Rs 23 Lakh

Around 3 months after two Rajkot-based hospital had been suspended from the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) scheme, the Health Department of Rajkot Municipal Corporation (RMC) has now taken similar action against Shanti Multispecialty Hospital in Rajkot for multiple irregulaties.

The Department has suspended the hospital from the PMJAY scheme for six months and imposed a fine of Rs 23 lakh on the hospital, TOI has reported.

For more information, click on the link below:

Powered by WPeMatico

NEET PG Counselling: UP DGME reopens registration portal after percentile reduction

Uttar Pradesh- Uttar Pradesh, Director General, Medical Education and Training (UPDGME) has reopened the registration portal window for online registration of all the upcoming rounds for eligible candidates under UP National Eligibility and Entrance Test-Postgraduate (NEET PG) counselling for the academic year 2024.

As per the official notice issued in this regard, candidates can complete the online registration process and deposit the registration fee/security amount for UP NEET PG 2024 counselling for admission to MD, MS, Diploma and DNB courses in government and private medical colleges from today i.e. 04 March 2025, 11:00 am to 06 March 2025, 05:00 pm.

The registration portal window has been reopened due to the reduction of the cut-off percentile to the 5th percentile for all categories i.e. General/EWS, UR-PwBD and SC/ST/OBC (including PwBD of SC/ST/OBC) by the National Board of Medical Examinations (NBEMS).

Meanwhile, newly eligible candidates as per the revised cut-off percentile for UP NEET PG 2024 counselling will have to register by logging on to the official website of UPDGME and paying the registration fee of Rs 2,000 online. However, the registration fee will not be refunded under any circumstances. i.e registration fee is not refundable. There is no need for re-registration of eligible candidates already registered for UP NEET PG-2024 counselling.

Along with this, to participate in the counselling, candidates will also have to deposit a security amount of Rs 30,000 online for MD/MS/Diploma and DNB course seats in government colleges and Rs 2,00,000 for MD/MS course seats in private colleges. However, by depositing a security amount of Rs 2,00,000, candidates will be eligible for both government and private seats.

Candidates whose registration fee & Security money is not deposited will not be eligible for choice filling in the UP NEET PG 2024 counseling process.

To view the notice, click the link below

https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/updgme-277035.pdf

Powered by WPeMatico

How cancer hijacks the immune system by draining T cells’ energy

Research into immunotherapy against cancer typically focuses on better recognition of cancer cells by the body’s own immune system. Researchers at Amsterdam UMC and Moffitt Cancer Center have taken a different approach.

Powered by WPeMatico

Nearly 1 in 5 US college athletes reports abusive supervision by their coaches

Nearly one in five college athletes report some form of abusive supervision—defined as sustained hostile verbal and non-verbal behaviors—by their coaches, reveals an analysis of survey responses involving National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes, and published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Powered by WPeMatico

More than half of adults and a third of children and adolescents predicted to have overweight or obesity by 2050

Without urgent policy reform and action, over half the world’s adult population (3.8 billion) and a third of all children and adolescents (746 million) are forecast to be living with overweight or obesity by 2050—posing an unparalleled threat of premature disease and death at local, national, and global levels, according to a major new analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study BMI Collaborators, published in The Lancet.

Powered by WPeMatico