USFDA issues EIR for Lupin Aurangabad facility

Mumbai: Global pharma major Lupin Limited has announced that it has received the Establishment Inspection Report (EIR) from the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) for its Aurangabad manufacturing facility.

The inspection was conducted from March 6 to March 15, 2024.

Read also: Lupin gets one USFDA observation for Aurangabad facility

The U.S. FDA has determined that the inspection classification of the facility is Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI). VAI means objectionable conditions or practices were found, but the agency is not prepared to take or recommend any administrative or regulatory action.


“We are pleased to receive the EIR with VAI status from the U.S. FDA as an outcome of the recent inspection of our Aurangabad facility. It is a testament to our commitment to consistently upholding the highest standards of compliance and providing high-quality healthcare solutions to patients worldwide,” said Nilesh Gupta, Managing Director, Lupin.

Read also: Lupin unveils first generic version of Oracea in US

Lupin is an innovation-led transnational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Mumbai, India. The Company develops and commercializes a wide range of branded and generic formulations, biotechnology products, and APIs in over 100 markets in the U.S., India, South Africa, and across the Asia Pacific (APAC), Latin America (LATAM), Europe, and Middle East regions.
The Company specializes in the cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, and respiratory segments and has a significant presence in the anti-infective, gastro-intestinal (GI), central nervous system (CNS), and women’s health areas. The company invested 7.9% of its revenue in research and development in FY23.
Lupin has 15 manufacturing sites, 7 research centers.

Read also: Lupin Gets CDSCO Panel Nod to Study Glycopyrronium Bromide, Vilanterol Trifenatate powder for inhalation in capsule

Powered by WPeMatico

NEET 2024 Exam City Intimation slip released

New Delhi- The National Testing Agency (NTA) has finally made the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) 2024 exam city slip live on its official website.

Candidates can now download the exam city slip from the NTA website. Following are the steps to download the exam city slip-

STEP 1- Visit the official website of NEET UG 2024.

STEP 2- On the appeared page, click on “NATIONAL ELIGIBILITY CUM ENTRANCE TEST (UG).”

STEP 3- Now on the homepage, click on the link that reads, “Click Here for City Intimation.”

STEP 4- Enter your login credentials as asked and then click on submit.

STEP 5- The exam city slips will be displayed on the screens.

STEP 6- Download it and take a printout for future reference.

NEET UG City Slip will contain the name, date of birth and registration number of the applicant along with the subjects and their codes. However, candidates are advised to verify these properly.

NTA has released the NEET UG City Slip in advance to help the candidates plan their travel and accommodation in the allotted cities.

On the other hand, the NEET-UG 2024 exam admit card will also be released in due course of time, so candidates are requested to keep checking the official website of NEET UG regularly.

In case of any discrepancy in the candidate’s details, the candidate should immediately contact the NTA Helpline during working hours i.e. 10 AM to 5 PM.

NEET-UG 2024 exam is being conducted by NTA on Sunday, May 5, 2024, from 02:00 PM to 05:20 PM. The examination will be conducted in pen and paper mode at various centres in India and abroad. NEET UG exam serves as the sole gateway and eligibility criteria for admission to all MBBS and BDS courses across the country. NTA’s preparations are in full swing to ensure the smooth conduct of the examination on the scheduled date.

Powered by WPeMatico

Sassoon Hospital Rat bite Case: Medical Superintendent removed, 3 others issued show cause notice

Pune: Taking action against laxity in duty regarding the death of a patient due to alleged rat bites at Sassoon General Hospital, the Directorate of Medical Education (DMER) directed the removal of medical superintendent Dr Ajay Taware from his current position and issued show-cause notices to a nurse, a sanitary inspector and a ward boy. 

The department directed Dr Taware to resign from his position due to administrative reasons and placed the three hospital staff on temporary suspension, granting them time to respond to the show cause notices.   

After Dr Taware stepped down from his position following an order issued by state medical education commissioner Rajeev Nivatkar, the department recently appointed Dr Yellapa Jadhav, associate professor of the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine (PSM) department as the new medical superintendent at the hospital. Dr Jadhav had previously been relieved of this position approximately a year ago.   

Also read- 3 Resident Doctors Of Gynaecology Dept Suspended After Woman Delivers Outside Jaipur Hospital

Speaking to HT, Rajiv Nivatkar said, “We have taken action for the laxity found as per the findings of the investigation report. The charge of the medical superintendent has been removed and a new medical superintendent has been appointed. People who were working in that respective department during the incident have been issued suspension notices.”  

This comes after a probe was ordered regarding the case of a patient passing away while undergoing treatment in the ICU allegedly due to rat bites at the hospital on April 1.     

The patient was admitted to the hospital on March 17 after he had severely injured himself in an accident where he had fallen from a bridge and was later placed under treatment at the ICU located on the ground floor of the old hospital building.

According to the family members, the patient died from rat bites as they claimed that rat bites were visible in two to three places in the deceased body. They further accused the hospital administration of negligence and demanded action against the hospital management and concerned doctors who were monitoring him.

As a result, the relatives submitted a written complaint to Dr Vinayak Kale, dean of B J Government Medical College. The complaint then gained the attention of the DMER who constituted an enquiry committee to probe the allegations. 

The three-member committee then visited the hospital and conducted an investigation. They took records of the statements of the hospital administration and the employees.   

On April 3, they completed the investigation and submitted the report to DMER which recommended that there were rat bites visible on the deceased body. The report further mentioned that the hospital administration also agreed to the rat bite claims during the probe. After the death of the patient, a postmortem was conducted which revealed that the patient died from rat bites as stated by the committee report. 

Dr Deelip Mhaisekar, DMER told the Daily, “Further action against senior officials will be taken by the state government. However, the order to remove the medical superintendent and suspension of three staff was issued late in the evening on Friday.”

“The medical education has taken the action in the purview of their power and state government has powers to take action against senior officials. The suspended staff can submit their response to the suspension show cause notice and if the reply is not found satisfactory, they will be suspended,” he added.

Also read- ICU Rat Bite Case: Telangana Doctors Protest Against Suspension Of Two Doctors, Nurse

Powered by WPeMatico

Diabetes Increases Risk of Infection After Ankle Replacement Surgery, Study Finds

Patients with diabetes undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) face a significantly higher risk of postoperative infections compared to those without the condition, according to a new study. The study results were published in the journal Foot Ankle International. 

The research, drawing on data from over 8,000 patients, highlights the increased challenges diabetic patients may encounter following ankle replacement surgery. Postoperative infections, aseptic loosening, and other perioperative medical complications present significant challenges following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Total ankle arthroplasty is performed to relieve pain and restore function in patients with ankle arthritis. While the procedure is generally effective, it comes with risks such as infections and the loosening of the artificial joint over time. Previous studies have indicated that diabetes could increase the likelihood of surgical complications, but the extent of its impact on ankle surgeries was not fully understood until now.
The study utilized a large insurance database to identify patients who underwent TAA between 2010 and 2021. Researchers focused on comparing the postoperative outcomes between patients diagnosed with diabetes and those without. Specifically, they examined the incidence of all-cause revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), septic revision (where the joint must be surgically cleaned or replaced due to infection), and aseptic revision (surgery not related to infection).
Results revealed that within five years of undergoing TAA, 7.3% of diabetic patients were diagnosed with a periprosthetic joint infection, compared to just 3.9% of non-diabetic patients. This marked a 95% increased risk of infection for those with diabetes. Furthermore, the incidence of septic revision was 1.4% in diabetic patients, significantly higher than the 0.4% observed in non-diabetics, translating to a 363% increased risk. Interestingly, the study found no significant difference in the overall rate of joint revisions between the two groups, suggesting that while diabetes increases the risk of specific serious complications like infections, it does not affect the broader likelihood of needing a joint revision for other reasons.
These findings underscore the importance of targeted perioperative management for diabetic patients undergoing ankle replacement surgery. Tailored strategies could help mitigate the increased risk of infection and improve outcomes for this vulnerable group.This comprehensive analysis not only confirms diabetes as a significant risk factor for postoperative complications in ankle replacement but also calls for further research to develop effective preventive measures. As the diabetic population continues to grow, understanding and addressing these risks becomes increasingly crucial in orthopedic surgery.

Further reading: Helbing J, Farley B, Gu A, et al. Diabetes Mellitus and Total Ankle Arthroplasty Complications. Foot Ankle Int. Published online February 8, 2024. doi:10.1177/10711007241226929

Powered by WPeMatico

SGLT2 Inhibitors vs. DPP4 Inhibitors: Study reveals new benefits of SGLT2i for prevention of hypertension

Japan: A recent study published in Hypertension Research using nationwide real-world data demonstrated the potential advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors over DPP4 inhibitors in reducing hypertension development in patients with diabetes.

In the realm of hypertension management, the emergence of novel pharmacotherapies has sparked interest in their comparative effectiveness. Among these, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors have gained prominence for their potential benefits beyond glycemic control.

The analysis used a nationwide large-scale health check-up and insurance claims dataset, including approximately 20,000 patients with diabetes, and compared the subsequent risk of hypertension development between SGLT2i and DPP4i users after propensity score matching. The administration of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of developing hypertension compared with DPP4i administration

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the possible advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors in incident hypertension using a large-scale epidemiological database,” the researchers wrote.

SGLT2 inhibitors act by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption, leading to glycosuria and natriuresis. Beyond glycemic control, they exhibit favorable effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Conversely, DPP4 inhibitors enhance insulin secretion while reducing glucagon levels, primarily targeting glycemic control by inhibiting the degradation of incretin hormones.

Although several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have reported the potential benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors in reducing blood pressure (BP), whether SGLT2i can reduce incident hypertension is unknown. Therefore, Hidehiro Kaneko, The Department of Advanced Cardiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, and colleagues analyzed individuals with diabetes who were newly prescribed SGLT2i or DPP4i in a large-scale epidemiological database.

The primary outcome was the incidence of hypertension. To compare the subsequent development of hypertension between the SGLT2i and DPP4i groups, a propensity score matching algorithm was employed. After propensity score matching, 5708 well-balanced pairs of SGLT2i and DPP4i users were identified.

The findings of the study were as follows:

  • SGLT2i administration was associated with a reduced risk of hypertension (HR 0.91).
  • The advantage of SGLT2i use over DPP4i use for incident hypertension was generally consistent in several sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses revealed that SGLT2i use was significantly associated with a lower risk of hypertension in men, patients with baseline HbA1c of <7.5%, and baseline systolic blood pressure ≥127 mmHg.

In conclusion, in real-world practice, there was a reduced risk of developing hypertension in individuals with diabetes who were newly prescribed SGLT2i compared to those who were newly prescribed DPP4i.

The study findings shed light on the new benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors as a hypertensive preventive medication.

Reference:

Suzuki, Y., Kaneko, H., Okada, A., Komuro, J., Fujiu, K., Takeda, N., Morita, H., Ako, J., Nishiyama, A., Yano, Y., Ieda, M., Node, K., Yasunaga, H., & Komuro, I. (2024). Comparison of incident hypertension between SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP4 inhibitors. Hypertension Research, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01649-z

Powered by WPeMatico

Low Insulin Sensitivity Linked to Albuminuria Development in Diabetes Patients: Study

A recent study uncovered a significant link between reduced insulin sensitivity and the development of albuminuria, a key marker of kidney damage, in individuals with diabetes. This finding were published in the journal of Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.

This study was conducted among Southwestern Indigenous American adults to investigate the association between insulin action and secretion measured before the onset of diabetes and the subsequent development of albuminuria after diabetes onset. The team led by Meeah Willig meticulously assessed baseline body composition, insulin sensitivity at different levels of insulin stimulation and insulin secretion in a total of 170 participants who eventually developed diabetes.

Over a median follow-up period of 13.6 years, approximately 48% of the participants developed albuminuria which indicates renal impairment. The individuals who developed albuminuria expressed similar demographic characteristics, such as age, sex and body fat percentage when compared to the individuals who did not. However, they displayed significantly lower insulin sensitivity, particularly at submaximal and maximal insulin stimulation levels.

Further analysis revealed a compelling association between lower insulin sensitivity and an elevated risk of albuminuria. Also, the participants with lower insulin sensitivity levels demonstrated a 51% higher risk of developing albuminuria when compared to the individuals with higher sensitivity levels. This suggests that impaired insulin signaling may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of proteinuria which is a hallmark of kidney damage in diabetes.

The study underlines the crucial role of insulin sensitivity in renal health among individuals with diabetes while insulin secretion did not show a significant association with the risk of albuminuria. These findings have significant implications for the management of diabetes and highlight the importance of addressing insulin resistance to prevent renal complications.

Source:

Willig, M. R., Stinson, E. J., Looker, H. C., Piaggi, P., Mitchell, C. M., Hanson, R. L., Nelson, R. G., Krakoff, J., & Chang, D. C. (2024). Insulin resistance before type 2 diabetes onset is associated with increased risk of albuminuria after diabetes onset: A prospective cohort study. In Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.15505

Powered by WPeMatico

Increased viral load and weaker immune response tied to severe COVID-19 infection among elderly, reveals study

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect people of all ages, a new study has delved into the reasons why older individuals face a higher risk of severe illness from the virus. The study found that the most severe impact was seen in the oldest adults, who exhibited higher levels of pro-inflammatory genes and proteins during severe disease, indicating that the body’s response to the virus becomes increasingly dysregulated with age. The study results were published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. 

The research, conducted on a cohort of 1,031 vaccine-naïve patients hospitalized for COVID-19, aimed to unravel the mysteries behind the relationship between age and disease severity. Led by a team of researchers, the study focused on analyzing the immune response of individuals across a wide age range, from 18 to 96 years old. Using advanced techniques such as mass cytometry, serum protein profiling, antibody assays, and transcriptomics, the scientists explored how aging influences the body’s ability to combat the virus. Their findings revealed several key insights into the impact of age on COVID-19 outcomes. Firstly, older patients exhibited higher levels of the virus upon hospital admission and experienced delayed clearance of the virus from their bodies. This suggests that aging may impair the body’s ability to effectively eliminate the virus, leading to prolonged illness and increased risk of complications.
Furthermore, the study uncovered age-related changes in the immune system, with older individuals showing alterations in both innate and adaptive immune responses. Specifically, there was an upregulation of innate immune signaling pathways and a downregulation of adaptive immune signaling pathways in older patients. This imbalance in immune function could contribute to the severity of COVID-19 in older adults. One notable finding was the decrease in naïve T and B cells—the immune cells responsible for recognizing and attacking new pathogens—in older individuals. Additionally, older patients had higher levels of monocytes, which are involved in inflammatory responses, further highlighting the dysregulation of the immune system with age. Importantly, the study also revealed that older adults experienced sustained activation of pro-inflammatory genes and elevated levels of serum chemokines, which are proteins involved in guiding immune cells to infection sites. This persistent inflammatory response may contribute to the development of severe COVID-19 symptoms in older patients.
The most concerning aspect of the research was the observation that the oldest adults exhibited the highest levels of pro-inflammatory genes and proteins during severe disease, indicating a heightened risk of complications with age. Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the biological mechanisms underlying the increased susceptibility of older individuals to severe COVID-19. By understanding these mechanisms, researchers hope to develop targeted treatments that could help improve outcomes for older patients battling the virus.

Further reading: Host-microbe multiomic profiling reveals age-dependent immune dysregulation associated with COVID-19 immunopathology. Doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adj51

Powered by WPeMatico

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Not Linked to Increased Pregnancy Risks: JAMA

Researchers have found in a new study that exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during pregnancy did not demonstrate an increased risk of specific adverse outcomes overall among mother or fetus.

The cohort study delved into the risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) exposure during pregnancy, addressing concerns about maternal and fetal health outcomes. The findings from the study shed light on the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during pregnancy, addressing concerns about maternal and fetal health outcomes. With the widespread use of ICIs in cancer treatment, understanding their impact on pregnancy-related adverse events is crucial for informed clinical decision-making and patient care.

The study aimed to assess the risk of adverse outcomes associated with ICI exposure compared to other anticancer agents, providing valuable insights into the safety profile of these medications during pregnancy. This study was published in JAMA Network Open by Paul G. and colleagues. Existing data on the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with ICI exposure are limited, necessitating comprehensive research in this area.

The cohort study analyzed data extracted from the World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase, encompassing reports of pregnancy-related conditions and the use of anticancer agents. A total of 3558 reports were included in the analysis, with 91 involving exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the remaining reports related to other anticancer drugs. The study sought to evaluate the incidence of adverse pregnancy, fetal, and newborn outcomes associated with ICI exposure compared to alternative anticancer treatments.

The key findings of the study were as follows:

  • The analysis revealed that exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during pregnancy did not show an increased risk of specific adverse outcomes compared to other anticancer drugs.

  • The combination of anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 was associated with a significantly higher incidence of preterm birth compared to other anticancer drugs (80.0% vs 23.0%).

  • Rare immune-related neonatal adverse events were identified, underscoring the need for caution in ICI use during pregnancy, particularly with certain combination therapies.

  • These findings highlight the importance of careful risk assessment and monitoring in pregnant patients receiving ICIs.

The study concludes that while exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during pregnancy did not demonstrate an increased risk of specific adverse outcomes overall, caution is warranted, particularly with certain combination therapies. Healthcare providers should carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks when considering the use of ICIs in pregnant patients, with a focus on minimizing potential harm to maternal and fetal health. Further research is needed to better understand the risks associated with ICI exposure during pregnancy and to inform clinical practice guidelines and decision-making processes.

Reference:

Gougis, P., Hamy, A.-S., Jochum, F., Bihan, K., Carbonnel, M., Salem, J.-E., Dumas, E., Kabirian, R., Grandal, B., Barraud, S., Coussy, F., Hotton, J., Savarino, R., Marabelle, A., Cadranel, J., Spano, J.-P., Laas, E., Reyal, F., & Abbar, B. (2024). Immune checkpoint inhibitor use during pregnancy and outcomes in pregnant individuals and newborns. JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e245625. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5625

Powered by WPeMatico

Large-scale genetic study links Irritable Bowel Syndrome and cardiovascular disease

New research published today in the journal Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology sheds light on disease mechanisms common to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

Led by Dr Leticia Camargo Tavares, a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Hypertension Research Laboratory within Monash University’s School of Biological Sciences, the study reveals novel insights into the genetic underpinnings of IBS, offering potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.

IBS is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders globally, affecting up to 10 per cent of the population, with a disproportionate impact on women.

It is characterised by a complex range of symptoms including abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea and constipation. IBS significantly compromises patients’ quality of life. Despite its widespread prevalence, the cause of IBS remains unclear, thus limiting treatment options.

An international consortium of researchers, drawing expertise from Monash University (Australia), CIC bioGUNE (Spain), LUM University, IRGB-CNR, CEINGE, and the University of Naples Federico II (Italy), as well as the University of Groningen (Netherlands), embarked on a comprehensive investigation.

Analysing data from two large European population cohorts-UK Biobank and Lifelines-the team scrutinised the genetic landscapes of 24,735 people with IBS and 77,149 symptom-free individuals.

Their analysis uncovered four genomic regions, including two previously unidentified loci, associated with increased susceptibility to IBS.

These genetic hotspots implicate pathways central to gastrointestinal motility, intestinal mucosal integrity, and circadian rhythm regulation.

“Although we’re yet to conclusively pinpoint specific genes and mechanisms, these findings provide novel insights into IBS pathophysiology, highlighting potential therapeutic targets. So, we expect follow-up research to build on these discoveries,” Dr Tavares said.

Moreover, the researchers found a remarkable link between IBS predisposition and various cardiovascular ailments, encompassing hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and angina pectoris.

Professor Mauro D’Amato, senior author and study supervisor from CIC bioGUNE and LUM University, described this new evidence as the most exciting outcome, underscoring the potential for shared therapeutic modalities.

In another important finding, the study revealed that IBS heritability (the weight of genes in determining one’s risk of disease), might be higher than previously thought. This, the authors say, may stem from their adherence to standardised classification criteria in delineating IBS phenotypes, notably the Rome Criteria from the Rome Foundation.

Reference:

Leticia Camargo Tavares et al, Rome III criteria capture higher irritable bowel syndrome SNP-heritability and highlight a novel genetic link with cardiovascular traits, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.04.002.

Powered by WPeMatico

Dangerous surgical site infections can be reduced with simple prevention protocol: Study

A new study published today in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC) demonstrates the use of a simple pre-surgical infection prevention protocol to prevent dangerous post-surgical infections. Researchers performed this investigation at the Soroka University Medical Center in Israel.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a type of healthcare-associated infection with deadly consequences for some patients. According to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were more than 110,000 SSIs linked to inpatient surgeries in the U.S. in 2015.1 These infections lead to a high rate of morbidity and mortality, with a patient’s estimated risk of death as much as 11 times higher than normal.2 SSIs also have a very high financial burden, with the average hospital stay extended by nearly 10 days and an estimated $20,000 in additional hospitalization costs per patient.

There are a number of recommended protocols to help prevent SSIs, but lack of patient compliance, high costs, and bacterial resistance can reduce their utility and effectiveness. In this new study, researchers aimed to evaluate the results of a protocol designed to reduce SSIs through a particular focus on the Staphylococcus aureus pathogen. The approach involved a pre-surgical intranasal application of povidone-iodine and skin antisepsis using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG).

The study involved 688 adult patients who had hip or knee arthroplasty or spine surgery at Soroka University Medical Center between February 2018 and October 2021. Their outcomes were compared to a retrospective patient cohort from 2016 and 2017 treated before the povidone-iodine component of the protocol was implemented. Patient outcomes were tracked for 90 days after surgery.

Deploying this intervention prior to surgery helped to address a broad challenge in healthcare, that some 30% of the population is colonized with S. aureus without exhibiting symptoms. The pre-surgical protocol successfully eradicated S. aureus in nearly 40% of patients found to already harbor the pathogen. This is particularly important for patient outcomes, as the researchers found that the presence of S. aureus within the day following surgery was associated with a three-fold risk of developing an SSI. Overall, the study showed a significant decrease in severe SSIs among patients who received the newer protocol.

“Our study clearly shows that we can prevent surgical site infections and keep patients safer through the use of a simple pre-surgical nasal application of povidone-iodine in combination with standard CHG bathing,” said Lisa Saidel-Odes, MD, Infectious Diseases specialist at Soroka University Medical Center and lead author of the paper. “We noted that the protocol is most effective in cases with little S. aureus present and suggest that an additional application of the povidone-iodine might be needed for patients with greater nasal colonization.”

Additional details from the study include:

  • Of the 688 patients included, 28 developed an SSI in the 90-day study window. Patients with diabetes were at particularly increased risk for developing an SSI.
  • Patients were screened for S. aureus prior to surgery. More than 16% were already colonized with either methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
  • Of patients who developed SSIs, S. aureus was not the only cause of infection. Eleven patients were infected with Enterobacterales.

“This study shows the power of applying widely available antiseptics to reduce SSIs and improve patient safety,” said Tania Bubb, PhD, RN, CIC, FAPIC, 2024 APIC president. “The results are encouraging not only because the regimen is effective in reducing SSI, but also because it is simple to implement and avoids the risk of antibiotic resistance.”

Reference:

Lisa Saidel-Odes, Rivka Yosipovich, Vadim Benkovich, Orli Sagi, Orly Shimoni, Abraham Borer, Getting the drop on Staphylococcus aureus: Semiquantitative Staphylococcus aureus nasal colony reduction in orthopedic surgery reduces surgical site infection, American Journal of Infection Control, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.02.014.

Powered by WPeMatico